2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-23878-9_41
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infeasibility Driven Evolutionary Algorithm with ARIMA-Based Prediction Mechanism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tapabrata Ray maintained a small percentage of infeasible solutions close to constraint boundaries during its course of evolution for constrained optimization (Ray, 2009). Patryk Filipiak and Maristela OliveiraSantos separately proposed an infeasibility-driven evolutionary algorithm and infeasibilityhandling approach in genetic algorithm (Filipiak, 2011;Santos, 2010). Both techniques use infeasible solutions in evolutionary computation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tapabrata Ray maintained a small percentage of infeasible solutions close to constraint boundaries during its course of evolution for constrained optimization (Ray, 2009). Patryk Filipiak and Maristela OliveiraSantos separately proposed an infeasibility-driven evolutionary algorithm and infeasibilityhandling approach in genetic algorithm (Filipiak, 2011;Santos, 2010). Both techniques use infeasible solutions in evolutionary computation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tapabrata Ray [7] (2009) maintained a small percentage of infeasible solutions close to constraint boundaries during its course of evolution for constrained optimization. Patryk Filipiak [8] (2011) and Maristela OliveiraSantos [9] (2010) separately proposed an infeasibility-driven evolutionary algorithm and infeasibility-handling approach in genetic algorithm (GA). Both techniques use infeasible solutions in evolutionary computation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%