2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2013.02.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infants understand the referential nature of human gaze but not robot gaze

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results demonstrate that infants encoded the habituation event as one in which the robot moved to reach their goal. Taken together, these findings add to the growing number of studies which suggest that when infants are presented with a robot equipped with perceptual features such as interactivity, including social eye gaze (e.g., Kanngiesser et al, 2015;Legerstee, Barna, & DiAdamo, 2000;O'Connell, Poulin-Dubois, Demke, & Guay, 2009;Okumura et al, 2013bOkumura et al, , 2013c, verbal communication (e.g., Arita et al, 2005;Okumura et al, 2013a), and human-like morphology (e.g., Kamewari et al, 2005), infants more readily construe the robot as capable of goal-directed behaviour.…”
supporting
confidence: 56%
“…These results demonstrate that infants encoded the habituation event as one in which the robot moved to reach their goal. Taken together, these findings add to the growing number of studies which suggest that when infants are presented with a robot equipped with perceptual features such as interactivity, including social eye gaze (e.g., Kanngiesser et al, 2015;Legerstee, Barna, & DiAdamo, 2000;O'Connell, Poulin-Dubois, Demke, & Guay, 2009;Okumura et al, 2013bOkumura et al, , 2013c, verbal communication (e.g., Arita et al, 2005;Okumura et al, 2013a), and human-like morphology (e.g., Kamewari et al, 2005), infants more readily construe the robot as capable of goal-directed behaviour.…”
supporting
confidence: 56%
“…A test of reflexive cueing using both highly anthropomorphic and highly stylized robots showed that robots failed to elicit reflexive cueing in people, suggesting that robots are cognitively processed more like arrows than like faces (Admoni, Bank, Tan, & Toneva, 2011;. In 12-month-old infants, eyetracking reveals anticipatory eye gaze shifts in response to human referential gaze but not to robot referential gaze (Okumura, Kanakogi, Kanda, Ishiguro, & Itakura, 2013a).…”
Section: Differences In Human Response To Robot and Human Gazementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, conclusions from this study are limited by the lack of statistical power (see Table 1), given the small number of cued trials (eight cued trials, p. 1986). In a similar line, Okumura, Kanakogi, Kanda, Ishiguro, and Itakura (2013) demonstrated that only a human gaze elicited anticipatory gaze shifts of 12-year-old infants, but robots did not have the same effect. On the other hand, Chaminade and Okka (2013) found that there was no difference in the magnitude of the gaze-cueing effects elicited by the head shift of a human face and of the NAO T14 robot face using nonpredictive cues (upper torso).…”
Section: Screen-based Paradigms Examining Joint Attention With Robot mentioning
confidence: 86%