2021
DOI: 10.1111/cdev.13616
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infants’ Mapping of New Faces to New Voices

Abstract: The ability to identify individuals by voice is fundamental for communication. However, little is known about the expectations that infants hold when learning unfamiliar voices. Here, the voice-learning skills of 4-and 8month-olds (N = 53; 29 girls, 14 boys of various ethnicities) were tested using a preferential-looking task that involved audiovisual stimuli of their mothers and other unfamiliar women. Findings reveal that the expectation that novel voices map on to novel faces emerges between 4 and 8 months … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(74 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…'s critique) and based our paradigm on infants' social abilities. From 3 months on, infants can associate a voice to a face ( Jordan and Brannon, 2006 ; Bahrick, et al., 2005 ; Brookes et al., 2001 ), and they apply a mutual exclusivity principle robustly after 8 months of age: i.e., when they already know a face-voice pair, they associate a new voice to a new face ( Orena and Werker, 2021 ). Therefore, we hypothesized that it might be possible to create an ambiguous situation if two faces were presented while a voice was speaking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…'s critique) and based our paradigm on infants' social abilities. From 3 months on, infants can associate a voice to a face ( Jordan and Brannon, 2006 ; Bahrick, et al., 2005 ; Brookes et al., 2001 ), and they apply a mutual exclusivity principle robustly after 8 months of age: i.e., when they already know a face-voice pair, they associate a new voice to a new face ( Orena and Werker, 2021 ). Therefore, we hypothesized that it might be possible to create an ambiguous situation if two faces were presented while a voice was speaking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, younger infants' looking behavior is determined by visual familiarity or novelty (Halberda, 2003; Mather & Plunkett, 2010). However, more recent studies have shown that 8‐month‐old infants can disambiguate the face of a novel voice when the familiar face and voice are highly familiar and belong to the infant's mother (Orena & Werker, 2021). This suggests that the classical disambiguation experiments (Halberda, 2003; Mather & Plunkett, 2010) may have underestimated infants' ability to disambiguate novel words by relying on words learned before coming to the laboratory, possibly by overestimating which words younger infants may already know and how well they know them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on previous work ( Orena and Werker, 2021 ), we preset the critical WoA to be 367 ms after the critical utterance (9,367–11,367 ms). Note that the WoA was offset by 367 ms as this is the reported duration of time needed for infants to initiate an eye movement after hearing speech sounds ( Swingley, 2012 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From an early age, humans are surprisingly adept at tracking highly familiar voices. Previous studies have reported that upon hearing their mother’s voice (and relative to hearing an unfamiliar woman’s voice), fetuses’ heart rate increased ( Hepper et al, 1993 ; Kisilevsky et al, 2003 ), newborns preferentially sucked on a pacifier in a non-nutritive sucking procedure ( DeCasper and Fifer, 1980 ), and 4-month-olds looked toward their mother (live: Spelke and Owsley, 1979 ; photograph: Orena and Werker, 2021 ). Infants can also differentiate between their father’s voice and an unfamiliar male voice ( DeCasper and Fifer 1980 ; Ward and Cooper, 1999 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%