2011
DOI: 10.1037/a0024023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infants learn about objects from statistics and people.

Abstract: In laboratory experiments, infants are sensitive to patterns of visual features that co-occur (e.g., Fiser & Aslin, 2002). Once infants learn the statistical regularities, however, what do they do with that knowledge? Moreover, which patterns do infants learn in the cluttered world outside of the laboratory? Across 4 experiments, we show that 9-month-olds use this sensitivity to make inferences about object properties. In Experiment 1, 9-month-old infants expected co-occurring visual features to remain fused (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
129
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(63 reference statements)
4
129
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[85,86]). It has been suggested by Kuhl [87] that 'Social cues 'gate' what and when children learn from language input.'…”
Section: Multiple Components Underpinning Statistical Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[85,86]). It has been suggested by Kuhl [87] that 'Social cues 'gate' what and when children learn from language input.'…”
Section: Multiple Components Underpinning Statistical Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Developmental psychology has accepted for decades that scaffolding is a critical factor promoting cognitive development, especially when children are faced with a situation that is beyond their current abilities [e.g., Wu et al, 2011]. The goal of scaffolding in child development is to provide initial support for the learner so that eventually the leaner can perform the task on her own.…”
Section: Individualized Scaffoldingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Open-minded input-driven learning involves observing and using patterns in the environment [Saffran, Aslin, & Newport, 1996;Wu, Gopnik, Richardson, & Kirkham, 2011] more often than relying on prior knowledge gained from previous experiences. This concept differs from closed-minded knowledge-driven learning, where the learner relies more on prior knowledge (e.g., schemas, routines, assump-tions) than input to acquire information for a given task.…”
Section: Open-minded Input-driven Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the images in the NOUN Database depict multi-part, multi-colored, real threedimensional (3D) objects as opposed to simple geometric shape configurations (e.g., L. B. Smith & Yu, 2008;Wu, Gopnik, Richardson, & Kirkham, 2011) or seemingly animate objects (e.g., Gauthier & Tarr, 1997;Mather, Schafer, & Houston-Price, 2011;Rakison & Poulin-Dubois, 2002). As such, these stimuli are ideal for researchers who need images of naturalistic, complex novel objects to present against images of real 3D objects that are already familiar to participants (e.g., familiar distractors or known competitors).…”
Section: Why Use the Noun Database?mentioning
confidence: 99%