2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2006.00182.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infantile Sensitivity to Ethanol's Motivational Effects: Ethanol Reinforcement During the Third Postnatal Week

Abstract: Infants appear sensitive to pharmacological reinforcing properties of low and relatively high ethanol doses. This sensitivity was revealed indirectly, by pairing gustatory stimuli with ethanol intoxication and then allowing these stimuli to act as second-order reinforcement for a quite different (tactile) stimulus. Behavioral activation elicited by the gustatory stimuli previously paired with a state of intoxication seems to compete with the expression of ethanol's motivational properties as assessed through i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
83
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
8
83
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The temporal coincidence between biphasic motivational and locomotor effects seems to argue in favor of the hypothesis that similar mechanisms underlie these processes (Risinger & Cunningham, 1992;Wise & Bozarth, 1987). Nevertheless, it is important to note that the lower dose here utilized (0.5 g/kg) was not observed to exert motor activating effects even though it is sufficient to act as a positive or negative (anti-anxiety) reinforcer in the developing infant (Molina, Ponce, Truxell, & Spear, 2006;Pautassi, Melloni, Ponce, & Molina, 2005;Pautassi et al, 2007). As a function of these considerations it appears that the results of the present study and those derived from the analysis of ethanol's early motivational effects partially support the hypothesis for common mechanisms underlying ethanol's reinforcement and activating effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The temporal coincidence between biphasic motivational and locomotor effects seems to argue in favor of the hypothesis that similar mechanisms underlie these processes (Risinger & Cunningham, 1992;Wise & Bozarth, 1987). Nevertheless, it is important to note that the lower dose here utilized (0.5 g/kg) was not observed to exert motor activating effects even though it is sufficient to act as a positive or negative (anti-anxiety) reinforcer in the developing infant (Molina, Ponce, Truxell, & Spear, 2006;Pautassi, Melloni, Ponce, & Molina, 2005;Pautassi et al, 2007). As a function of these considerations it appears that the results of the present study and those derived from the analysis of ethanol's early motivational effects partially support the hypothesis for common mechanisms underlying ethanol's reinforcement and activating effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Taken together, the data suggest that fetal experience-induced olfactory plasticity, in response to ethanol, is a means by which olfactory system function becomes tuned (both behaviorally and neurophysiologically) to emphasize the transduction of ethanol's chemosensory attributes. Consequently, these effects could either underlie or work in concert with the reinforcing properties of ethanol (Cunningham, 1998;Cunningham, Clemans, & Fidler, 2002;Molina, Ponce, Truxell, & Spear, 2006) to establish the previously described enhanced behavioral responsiveness to ethanol odor as a result of fetal experience. From a clinical perspective, an enhanced preference for ethanol odor may be an important contributor to the risk for an enhanced postnatal avidity for the drug.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When considering the average weight of our subjects (31 g), total intake of EtOH delivered might have induced a maximum EtOH dose of 0.19 g/kg, approximately. Taking into account previous work conducted at this age, (e.g., Molina et al, 2006) it could be estimated that blood ethanol levels (BELs) induced by the pre-exposure treatment can reach a maximal level of approximately 17 mg%.…”
Section: Pre-exposure and Intraoral Infusion Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Employment of the higher volume was chosen so as to deliver an EtOH dose approximately equivalent to 0.5 g/kg. Postadministration effects of this EtOH dose have been observed to exert appetitive effects in developing animals (Fernández-Vidal et al, 2003;Molina et al, 2006Molina et al, , 2007. Hence, total volume of EtOH infused was either 250 or 500 ul.…”
Section: First Conditioning Phase: Pups Were Introduced In Clear Plexmentioning
confidence: 99%