1985
DOI: 10.1016/s0065-2407(08)60392-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infant Visual Preferences: A Review and New Theoretical Treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
60
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The stimulus could either have a positive (interaction) or negative (danger) value, but, in both instances, it appears to be worth looking at it. Preferential looking paradigms cannot provide any information about the positive or negative valence of the shown stimuli, or the reason why one stimulus is visually preferred over the other (Banks & Ginsburg, ). As a consequence, based on the present data, we are unable to draw a definite conclusion on whether the longer looking time directed to the approaching and colliding stimulus was due to interest or threat.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stimulus could either have a positive (interaction) or negative (danger) value, but, in both instances, it appears to be worth looking at it. Preferential looking paradigms cannot provide any information about the positive or negative valence of the shown stimuli, or the reason why one stimulus is visually preferred over the other (Banks & Ginsburg, ). As a consequence, based on the present data, we are unable to draw a definite conclusion on whether the longer looking time directed to the approaching and colliding stimulus was due to interest or threat.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, manipulating the internal elements by movement or increasing contour density may overcome the effect (Bushnell 1979;Garon and Swartz 1980). Although attempts have been made to account for the externality effect in terms of the linear systems model of infant preference (Banks and Salapatek 1981;Banks and Ginsburg 1985;Aslin and Smith 1988), separate accounts of the first two characteristics of newborn visual behavior (saccadic pursuit tracking and preferential orienting) would then still be required. An alternative approach can accommodate facts from all three phenomena reviewed here.…”
Section: F I E 'Externality' Efect"mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up to about 3 months of age versions of this model can predict certain infant pattern preferences involving paired presentations of high contrast geometric patterns with a correlation of 0.96 (Banks and Ginsburg 1985). After this age the model may become less successful (Aslin and Smith 1988).…”
Section: F I E 'Externality' Efect"mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though neonates' ability to discern fine visual detail is limited (Banks, 1980;Banks and Ginsburg, 1985), they do look preferentially at visual stimuli that are patterned, high-contrast, or moving (Walker-Andrews, 1997). Newborns look longer at face-like stimuli and track them farther than non-face-like stimuli (Goren et al, 1975;Johnson et al, 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%