1981
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1981.tb03079.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infant Tests as Predictors of Cognitive and Language Development at Two Years

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We did not directly test when our participants exactly acquired the ability to perform a given tool-directed motor programme, or to comprehend (or produce) its associated label. Nevertheless, our claim is supported by a wealth of developmental studies showing that the motor control required to perform deictic gestures, gestural routines, and tool use develops synchronously with word acquisition and, in particular, with word comprehension (Bates & Dick, 2002;Siegel, 1981). Patients' performance was analysed at the group and at the single-case level, to investigate potential dissociations between tasks also in those cases whose performance might be opposite and, therefore, masked by the group-level trend (Caramazza, 1986;Shallice, 1988).…”
Section: Please Scroll Down For Articlementioning
confidence: 75%
“…We did not directly test when our participants exactly acquired the ability to perform a given tool-directed motor programme, or to comprehend (or produce) its associated label. Nevertheless, our claim is supported by a wealth of developmental studies showing that the motor control required to perform deictic gestures, gestural routines, and tool use develops synchronously with word acquisition and, in particular, with word comprehension (Bates & Dick, 2002;Siegel, 1981). Patients' performance was analysed at the group and at the single-case level, to investigate potential dissociations between tasks also in those cases whose performance might be opposite and, therefore, masked by the group-level trend (Caramazza, 1986;Shallice, 1988).…”
Section: Please Scroll Down For Articlementioning
confidence: 75%
“…Tests have been somewhat more predictive, however, for infants who score low (Honzik, 1976), but individual prediction even for atrisk infants is low (Hunt, 1981). Studies that have identified specific abilities from infant tests, such as perceptual-motor behaviors, report stronger associations from infancy to early childhood (Siegel, 1981).…”
Section: Prediction Of Intellectual Development Has Been the Focus Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The longitudinal study of preterm infants has been a research strategy used in investigating the prediction of developmental problems (e.g., Caputo, Goldstein, & Taub, 1981;Field, Dempsey, & Shuman, 1981;Hunt, 1981;Siegel, 1981). Preterm infants are considered at risk because as a group they have greater incidence of developmental handicaps than do full-term infants.…”
Section: Prediction Of Intellectual Development Has Been the Focus Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It contains 45 items, which represent six subscales. Certain HOME subscales have shown good concurrent and predictive validity with measures of the child's mental test performance (Elardo, Bradley, & Caldwell, 1975;Siegel, 1981). Three of these scales (1-emotional and verbal responsivity of the mother, 4-provision of appropriate play materials, and 5-maternal involvement with the child) were summed to create a composite HOME measure.…”
Section: Home Observation F O R Measurement Of the Environment (Home)mentioning
confidence: 99%