1978
DOI: 10.2307/1128611
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infant Speech Sound Discrimination: The Effects of Contingent versus Noncontingent Stimulus Presentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
1
2

Year Published

1979
1979
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
9
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is this second effect that explains the increase in sucking rates after the change of syllable in a contingent situation. When there is no es tablished relation between sucking activity and sound presentation, no increase in suck ing rates after a change of syllable is observed [12,13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is this second effect that explains the increase in sucking rates after the change of syllable in a contingent situation. When there is no es tablished relation between sucking activity and sound presentation, no increase in suck ing rates after a change of syllable is observed [12,13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the increase in sucking generally observed to a nov el stimulus also occurs only in the contingent arrangement. It is absent in a no-sound condition [Kuhl, 1976b] and also when the sounds are pre sented noncontingently, either periodically or randomly [Williams and Golenski, 1978]. Thus, the HAS paradigm results cannot be attributed to cyclical changes in the infant's sucking pattern, but truly reflect the ac quisition of control over the contingencies involved, coupled with perhaps an 'interest' in the novel speech sound.…”
Section: Origins and Underlying Processesmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…A megerősítést a vizsgálatvezető adja, abban az esetben, ha az adott választ a vizsgálati terv megerősítendőként jelölte meg (például a VRA-módszer bemutatásánál említett példában azokat a próbákat, amelyekben a zajhoz egy szinuszos hangot adtak hozzá). Akár újszülötteknél is alkalmazható az üres (nem táp-lálkozási) szopómozgás operáns kondicionálása (a nagy amplitúdójú szopómozgás eljárás; angol rövidítéssel HAS; WILLIAMS és GOLENSKI, 1978;JUSCZYK, 1985;újszülöttekre adaptálta FLOCCIA, CHRISTOPHE és BERTONCINI, 1997). Az eljárás során a csecsemő szájába egy speciális cumit tesznek, amely méri a szopómozgások erősségét.…”
Section: Viselkedéses Vizsgálati Módszerekunclassified