2004
DOI: 10.1080/0300443032000153516
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infant sleep: a review of normative and problematic sleep and interventions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 118 publications
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the first month of infancy, most infants awaken every 3-4 hours and require caregivers to settle them back to sleep (Middlemiss, 2004;Wolfson et al, 1992). These frequent night-wakings, which impact the duration of night sleep, tend to reduce in frequency during the first year (Goodlin-Jones & Anders, 2004).…”
Section: Infant Sleep and Parental Psychological Functioningmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…During the first month of infancy, most infants awaken every 3-4 hours and require caregivers to settle them back to sleep (Middlemiss, 2004;Wolfson et al, 1992). These frequent night-wakings, which impact the duration of night sleep, tend to reduce in frequency during the first year (Goodlin-Jones & Anders, 2004).…”
Section: Infant Sleep and Parental Psychological Functioningmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The body of research examining sleep arrangements, sleep disruption, and child outcomes is growing (for comprehensive reviews, see Goldberg & Keller, 2007;Middlemiss, 2004), but it is complicated by definitional issues and inconsistent terminology. Although solitary sleepers have been consistently defined as infants who sleep alone in their own room (Ball, 2003;Javo, Ronning, & Heyerdahl, 2004;Keller & Goldberg, 2004;Rothrauff, Middlemiss, & Jacobson, 2004), shared sleep can exist along a wide spectrum in terms of duration, degree of proximity, and degree of physical contact between parent and infant (Goldberg & Keller, 2007;McKenna & Volpe, 2007).…”
Section: Sleep Arrangementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the fact that, historically, the practice of co-sleeping was the norm, as it remains in most non-Westernized cultures (e.g., Ball, Hooker, & Kelly, 1999;Latz et al, 1999), researchers in opposition to co-sleeping have proposed concerns that this practice may hinder the development of infants' independence and lead to the development of sleeping patterns that are hard to change when parents want their child to move to a solitary sleeping arrangement (for a review, see Middlemiss, 2004). Others have shown that co-sleeping as a means of managing problematic sleep (i.e., reactive co-sleeping) tends to exacerbate childhood sleep problems (Lozoff, Wolf, & Davis, 1984;Madansky & Edelbrock, 1990;Zuckerman, Stevenson, & Bailey, 1987).…”
Section: Review Of the Literature On Correlates Of Infant Co-sleepingmentioning
confidence: 99%