2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.01.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infant robot-assisted laparoscopic upper urinary tract reconstructive surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Laparoscopy has provided the benefit of better magnification, but this approach does come with a steep learning curve in suturing techniques and tissue manipulation leading to longer operative times (15,16). The suture techniques prove to be especially difficult in children due to smaller tissue and limited abdominal space available for instrument manipulation.…”
Section: Review Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laparoscopy has provided the benefit of better magnification, but this approach does come with a steep learning curve in suturing techniques and tissue manipulation leading to longer operative times (15,16). The suture techniques prove to be especially difficult in children due to smaller tissue and limited abdominal space available for instrument manipulation.…”
Section: Review Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Avery et al [19] recently demonstrated a 91% success rate after RALP in infants. Two small center series have demonstrated the efficacy of RALP in infants with perioperative outcomes similar to open surgery and lower analgesic requirements [20,21]. Collectively, these findings suggest that urologic surgeons are slowly traversing the initial technical limitations of robot-assisted laparoscopy in infants and the application of this technology in younger children is increasing at academic centers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This cut-off appears to be feasible both technically and in terms of anaesthesia [16]. With the introduction of robotic MIS, this goal might even be easier to accomplish [17,18]. Nevertheless, feasibility alone does not make a procedure good for the patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%