2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2010.05.072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infant data from pre- and post-natal development studies in cynomolgus monkeys of different origins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, despite taking into consideration all pregnancy outcomes except live births, the incidence of non‐viable births reported here (3.32%) was still considerably lower compared with stillbirths levels reported in the literature for captive‐bred cynomolgus monkeys, which ranged from 5.1% to 22% [Gardin et al, ; Hobbs et al, ; Sesbuppha et al, ; Timmermans et al, ]. These differences in the incidence of non‐viable births could be due to differences in breeding colony management strategies [Honess et al, ], caging [Boot et al, ], and even origin of the monkeys [Oneda et al, ]. However, the reported level of non‐viable birth in this study may have been affected by fetuses being cannibalized at earlier stages of their development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Thus, despite taking into consideration all pregnancy outcomes except live births, the incidence of non‐viable births reported here (3.32%) was still considerably lower compared with stillbirths levels reported in the literature for captive‐bred cynomolgus monkeys, which ranged from 5.1% to 22% [Gardin et al, ; Hobbs et al, ; Sesbuppha et al, ; Timmermans et al, ]. These differences in the incidence of non‐viable births could be due to differences in breeding colony management strategies [Honess et al, ], caging [Boot et al, ], and even origin of the monkeys [Oneda et al, ]. However, the reported level of non‐viable birth in this study may have been affected by fetuses being cannibalized at earlier stages of their development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%