1996
DOI: 10.2307/1131869
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infant Affective Reactions to the Resumption of Maternal Interaction after the Still-Face

Abstract: To investigate infants' reactions to the Face-to-Face Still-Face Paradigm and in particular the reunion episode, 50 6-month-olds' affective, behavioral, and physiologic reactions were recorded and analyzed. Infants reacted to the still-face with negative affect, a drop in vagal tone, and an increase in heart rate. By contrast, they reacted to the reunion episode with a mixed pattern of positive and negative affect. There was a carryover of negative affect from the still-face, an increase in fussiness and cryin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

33
264
0
3

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 274 publications
(300 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
33
264
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Although some studies have found increases in RSA during positive affect tasks (Bazhenova, Plonskaia, & Porges, 2001), others have found that behavioral indicators of positive affect did not reliably correspond with changes in RSA (Weinberg & Tronick, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Although some studies have found increases in RSA during positive affect tasks (Bazhenova, Plonskaia, & Porges, 2001), others have found that behavioral indicators of positive affect did not reliably correspond with changes in RSA (Weinberg & Tronick, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Typically, infants emit less positive affect and display more negative arousal or self-comforting behaviours during maternal Still-Face (Cohn & Tronick, 1987, 1989Gianino & Tronick, 1988;Toda & Fogel, 1993;Tronick et al, 1978;Weinberg & Tronick, 1996). Furthermore, infants exhibit a carry-over of negative affect from the still-face to the re-engagement episode named still-face effect (Weinberg, Tronick, Cohn, & Oslon, 1999).…”
Section: Behavioural Differences During Ffsf and Their Relation With mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Still Face maternal unavailability is simulated by having the parent hold a flat, unresponsive expression for a brief period of time; this is preceded and followed by short episodes of normal face-to-face interaction. The temporary maternal unavailability and lack of responsiveness during this procedure is a reliable stress inducer, even for very young infants (Field et al, 1986;Weinberg & Tronick, 1996). Many mothers also report feeling distressed by the experience of holding a still, unresponsive, expression while their infants are upset, and as an illustration of the motivational function of emotions, research has shown that differences in report of maternal distress during the Still Face correspond to different parenting behaviors during the period following the procedure (Mayes et al, 1991).…”
Section: Assessing the "Emotional Dance" Between Parents And Infantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Still Face has been widely used to examine infant emotion regulation in response to temporary maternal unavailability with infants between two and seven months of age Tronick, 1989;Weinberg & Tronick, 1996). The procedure itself is composed of three brief segments that challenge infant, and presumably parent, affective self-regulation: a first "Free Play" segment during which the mother and infant interact in face-toface play; a second period, the "Still Face," during which the mother holds a still face and is unresponsive to the infant; and a final "Reengagement" episode, during which the mother again interacts in face-to-face play with the infant.…”
Section: Maternal and Infant Affective Behavior During The Still Facementioning
confidence: 99%