2015
DOI: 10.1002/term.2036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inexpensive production of near-native engineered stromas

Abstract: Although the self-assembly approach is an efficient method for the production of engineered physiological and pathological tissues, avoiding the use of exogenous materials, it nevertheless remains expensive and requires dexterity, which are features incompatible with large-scale production. We propose a modification to this technique to make easier the production of mesenchymal compartment, to reduce the cost and to improve the histological quality of the self-assembled tissues. The stroma produced by this nov… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This low throughput model, by recapitulating key features of epidermal differentiation and capillary assembly, can be an excellent tool to complete and confirm data obtained from high throughput screening using spheroids alone 46,60 . The production time of the dermal compartment can be further reduced by using reseeding methods 61 . Being produced in standard 12 well- and 6 well culture plates, tissues can easily be adapted for partially automatized production, allowing a scale-up and a more high throughput-like use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This low throughput model, by recapitulating key features of epidermal differentiation and capillary assembly, can be an excellent tool to complete and confirm data obtained from high throughput screening using spheroids alone 46,60 . The production time of the dermal compartment can be further reduced by using reseeding methods 61 . Being produced in standard 12 well- and 6 well culture plates, tissues can easily be adapted for partially automatized production, allowing a scale-up and a more high throughput-like use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Urothelial cells were extracted from a human urological tissue biopsy and were cultured as previously described (Chabaud et al , ). UCs were seeded at a density of 5 × 10 5 cells in 75‐cm 2 culture flasks with 1.5 × 10 5 irradiated murine S3T3 as a feeder layer in DMEM with Ham's F12 in a 3:1 proportion (Flow Laboratory, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (Hyclone), 5 mg/ml insulin (Sigma), 0.4 mg/ml hydrocortisone (Calbiochem, San Diego, CA, USA), 10 −10 m cholera toxin (Sigma), 10 μg/ml epidermal growth factor (Austral Biologicals, San Ramon, CA, USA), 100 U/ml penicillin, 25 mg/ml gentamicin and buffered with sodium bicarbonate (UC media).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, tissue engineering (TE) has been emerging as a promising field to develop appropriate models and technologies to promote regeneration of human tissues or to replace damaged or defective organs . TE strategies include cell‐based therapies to create new tissues via cellular biochemical machinery stimulation . Furthermore, the implantation of nonliving components, such as three‐dimensional (3D) scaffolds or matrices, has been widely studied, especially to support cell attachment and growth .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 TE strategies include cell-based therapies to create new tissues via cellular biochemical machinery stimulation. 7,8 Furthermore, the implantation of nonliving components, such as threedimensional (3D) scaffolds or matrices, has been widely studied, especially to support cell attachment and growth. 9 Indeed, 3D scaffolds are one of the most promising experimental approaches for regenerating the native structural Correspondence to: R. N. Granito (e-mail: re_neves@yahoo.com.br) and functional properties of living tissues, providing a 3D physical support for in vitro cell culture as well as a matrix for tissue regeneration in vivo.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation