Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-34469-8_50
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inexact Fast Multipole Boundary Element Tearing and Interconnecting Methods

Abstract: Summary. The Boundary Element Tearing and Interconnecting (BETI) methods have recently been introduced as boundary element counterparts of the wellestablished Finite Element Tearing and Interconnecting (FETI) methods. In this paper we present inexact data-sparse versions of the BETI methods which avoid the elimination of the primal unknowns and dense matrices. The data-sparse approximation of the matrices and the preconditioners involved is fully based on Fast Multipole Methods (FMM). This leads to robust solv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The FETI method has also been used for boundary elements, see [64] and references therein, and coupling of such methods with FETI algorithms has been investigated, see [65].…”
Section: Condition Number Estimate and Numerical Scalabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FETI method has also been used for boundary elements, see [64] and references therein, and coupling of such methods with FETI algorithms has been investigated, see [65].…”
Section: Condition Number Estimate and Numerical Scalabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each has 3N × 3N entries, so the computational cost is quadratic in the vertex count and thus, unfortunately, scales worse than FEM, which scales linearly in the number of volumetric elements, in practice; we ignore the matrix inversion costs here since we perform inversion in the precomputation step. The BEM community has noticed this issue and proposed compression methods [LSSW12]. The existing methods [KS15; MS10] for elastodynamics simulations do not yet show test cases with large deformations and high compression ratios that we aim for.…”
Section: Surface‐only Dynamic Deformablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the approach presented herein offers great flexibility in terms of mesh non-conformity. By writing the system matrix as (22) where (23)…”
Section: Matrix Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%