2005
DOI: 10.1007/bf02428167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inertial effects of quartz force transducers embedded in a split Hopkinson pressure bar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, at a given frequency, the error is larger for specimens with less stiffness. Compensation for acceleration in an impact test using a split Hopkinson pressure bar was developed using quartz force transducers attached to the bar [20]. It shows that the high initial bump in the recorded stress is due to the inertia effect and can be eliminated with proper correction.…”
Section: Inertia Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, at a given frequency, the error is larger for specimens with less stiffness. Compensation for acceleration in an impact test using a split Hopkinson pressure bar was developed using quartz force transducers attached to the bar [20]. It shows that the high initial bump in the recorded stress is due to the inertia effect and can be eliminated with proper correction.…”
Section: Inertia Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to increase the transmission signal, a hollow aluminum transmission bar was used (Chen et al, 1998) and highly sensitive semiconductor strain gages (Kyowa Electronic Instruments Co, LTD, KSP-2-1K-E4) were attached on the transmission bar. Quartz-crystal force transducers (Boston Piezo-Optics, Inc.) were used to verify the dynamic equilibrium in the specimen (Chen et al, 2000;Casem et al, 2005).…”
Section: Modification To Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Building on the society's history in photoelastic coatings and full field methods there have been expansive studies into dynamic fracture mechanics, such as [19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. SEM members have contributed significantly to advances in the Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar (SHPB) or Kolsky Bar technique [6], expanding it's loading range, analysis, and material applicability [25][26][27][28][29][30], methods have been developed for heating specimens [31], and moving from strain gages to embedded quartz force transducers [32,33]. The SHPB has been expanded into tensile loading [34][35][36][37] including 3D full field strain measurements [38], shear loading through both torsion bars [39] and specimen design [40], fracture [41], and dynamic friction measurements [42].…”
Section: Members Of the Photoelasticity Conference And Guestsmentioning
confidence: 99%