2016
DOI: 10.1111/lit.12099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inequitable variations: a review of research in technology, literacy studies and special education

Abstract: This essay presents the results of a review of research published in the last 10 years on the uses of what we term ‘productive’ digital technologies in special education contexts. There is little overlap between research on productive technologies such as digital storytelling in mainstream contexts and research on technology use to support literacy learning in special education classrooms. Analysis centred on theoretical frameworks, research methods, educational contexts and technologies used with children and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, because Javier was a Spanish-dominant English learner, his case offered opportunities to explore intersections of language acquisition, learning disability and multimodal digital composition that are seldom considered in relation to each other (see Adai et al, 2017, for a discussion of the intersection of the first two categories). Our last motivator was social justice: we wanted to examine what happens when we redistribute resources such as digital video composing to children like Javier, who seldom have access to such productive technologies (Pandya and Ávila, 2017). These varied considerations made Javier an appealing subject around which to craft a case.…”
Section: Disability Studies Critical Special Education Research and Intersectionalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, because Javier was a Spanish-dominant English learner, his case offered opportunities to explore intersections of language acquisition, learning disability and multimodal digital composition that are seldom considered in relation to each other (see Adai et al, 2017, for a discussion of the intersection of the first two categories). Our last motivator was social justice: we wanted to examine what happens when we redistribute resources such as digital video composing to children like Javier, who seldom have access to such productive technologies (Pandya and Ávila, 2017). These varied considerations made Javier an appealing subject around which to craft a case.…”
Section: Disability Studies Critical Special Education Research and Intersectionalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…iPad apps, computer programs). Pandya and Ávila (2017) argue that children with disabilities are often left out of productive digital literacies practices; this project both redistributed those practices to a student with special needs and afforded us the opportunity to explore the intersectional identities visible in Javier's digital artefacts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with respect to reading and writing. However, there is little overlap between research on educational technologies used in full-class environments and technology used to support literacy in special education interventions (Pandya & Avila, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%