Inequality, income dynamics, and worker transitions: The case of Mexico

Abstract

We characterize the salient features of the distribution of (log) earnings of formal workers in Mexico using social security records for the period 2005–2019. The analysis is based on a nonparametric approach and is focused primarily on the properties of the distribution of earnings changes. We find strong evidence of deviations from normality of this distribution in terms of negative skewness and high kurtosis, with these deviations varying with income and along the worker's life cycle. A comparison between results obtained with administrative data and household survey data suggests that this latter source of information is inadequate to fully capture the evolution of inequality and the properties of earnings changes as nonresponse is nonrandom and concentrated among formal and highly educated workers—likely the highest earners. Due to the relative size of the informal sector in the Mexican economy, which results in a large number of workers maintaining a weak attachment to formal employment, we also study the impact of transitions out of and back into formal employment on wages earned in the formal sector. We document that workers who exit formal employment experience a significant wage penalty upon reentry taking, on average, 3 or more years to achieve comparable preexit wage levels.

Inequality and dynamics of earnings and disposable income in Denmark 1987–2016

“…The pattern, where the difference between the 90th and 10th percentiles, p90–p10, is decreasing over the life cycle, is similar to Norway (Halvorsen, Ozkan, and Salgado (2022)) and Sweden (Friedrich, Laun, and Meghir (2022), and to some degree, France (Kramarz, Nimier‐David, and Delemotte (2022)), Brazil (Engbom, Gonzaga, Moser, and Olivieri (2022)), Argentina (Blanco, Diaz de Astarloa, Drenik, Moser, and Trupkin (2022)), and Germany (Drechsel‐Grau, Peichl, Schmid, Schmieder, Walz, and Wolter (2022)), but it appears not to be the typical pattern in Canada (Bowlus, Gouin‐Bonenfant, Liu, Lochner, and Park (2022)), the UK (Bell, Bloom, and Blundell (2022)), Italy (Hoffmann, Malacrino, and Pistaferri (2022)), Spain (Arellano, Bonhomme, De Vera, Hospido, and Wei (2022)), and Mexico (Puggioni, Calderón, Cebreros Zurita, Fernández Bujanda, Gonzalez, and Jaume (2022)).…”

The evolution of the earnings distribution in a volatile economy: Evidence from Argentina

“…This methodology detects breaks in the stochastic process of wages in non-Gaussian wage setting models. We verify the validity of this methodology by cali-2 In this manner, we contribute to an emerging literature that compares administrative and household survey data in other emerging economies such as Brazil (Engbom, Gonzaga, Moser, and Olivieri (2022)) and Mexico (Puggioni, Calderón, Cebreros Zurita, Fernández Bujanda, Inguanzo González, and Jaume (2021)).…”

“…22 In this manner, we contribute to an emerging literature that compares administrative and household survey data in other emerging economies such as Brazil (Engbom, Gonzaga, Moser, and Olivieri (2022)) and Mexico (Puggioni, Calderón, Cebreros Zurita, Fernández Bujanda, Inguanzo González, and Jaume (2021)). …”

Global trends in income inequality and income dynamics: New insights from GRID

“…Hoffmann, Malacrino, and Pistaferri (2022) investigate the role of structural labor market reforms in shaping earnings dynamics in Italy. Puggioni, Calderon, Zurita, Bujanda, Gonzalez, and Jaume (2022) study how time away from formal employment shapes future earnings in Mexico. Halvorsen, Ozkan, and Salgado (2022) analyze the intergenerational transmission of income dynamics in Norway.…”