Democracy and Fake News 2020
DOI: 10.4324/9781003037385-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inequality in the Public Sphere

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The idea that the legacy media holds itself to the highest standards of objectivity itself reflects a ‘racial amnesia’ that ‘we once lived in an era of unproblematic truth’ that benefitted everyone equally (Mejia et al, 2018: 113). Disinformation regarding women, racialised and LGBTQ+ people has, therefore, long underpinned political projects of exclusion from the public sphere, through which powerful actors seek to preserve the status quo (Piras, 2020: 33). In the UK context, tabloid newspapers in particular produced ‘news of dubious civic value’ well before the social media age (Chadwick et al, 2018: 4259).…”
Section: Post-truth Online Abuse and Bordering Over Expertisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea that the legacy media holds itself to the highest standards of objectivity itself reflects a ‘racial amnesia’ that ‘we once lived in an era of unproblematic truth’ that benefitted everyone equally (Mejia et al, 2018: 113). Disinformation regarding women, racialised and LGBTQ+ people has, therefore, long underpinned political projects of exclusion from the public sphere, through which powerful actors seek to preserve the status quo (Piras, 2020: 33). In the UK context, tabloid newspapers in particular produced ‘news of dubious civic value’ well before the social media age (Chadwick et al, 2018: 4259).…”
Section: Post-truth Online Abuse and Bordering Over Expertisementioning
confidence: 99%