2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2013.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inequality, growth and mobility: The intertemporal distribution of income in European countries 2003–2007

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
18
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Two recent contributions are Checchi et al . () and Van Kerm and Pi Alperin () who provide an overview of wage inequality using EU‐SILC data for 26 European countries. Both studies suggest that the most unequal earnings can be observed for Portugal and Eastern European countries, while more compressed earnings distributions can be found for the Scandinavian countries.…”
Section: Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Two recent contributions are Checchi et al . () and Van Kerm and Pi Alperin () who provide an overview of wage inequality using EU‐SILC data for 26 European countries. Both studies suggest that the most unequal earnings can be observed for Portugal and Eastern European countries, while more compressed earnings distributions can be found for the Scandinavian countries.…”
Section: Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, comparative studies predominantly cover small sets of countries (e.g., Burkhauser and Poupore, ; Aaberge et al ., ; Hofer and Weber, ; Gregg and Vittori, ). One of the few studies providing evidence for a large number of countries is Van Kerm and Pi Alperin (), employing recent EU‐SILC data. The findings of these cross‐country analyses reveal that despite the large differences in earnings inequality, the patterns of earnings mobility are rather similar.…”
Section: Previous Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Online summaries are available from Eurostat (Eurostat 2011). Information about persistent poverty rates are also provided, though using an earlier EU-SILC data release by, inter alia, Social Situation Observatory (2010a, b) and Van Kerm and Pi Alperin (2010). Compared to these sources, we provide greater detail about patterns of persistent poverty across EU countries, use a later year's data (which 8 The cross-sectional files contain data for all EU member states plus Norway and Iceland.…”
Section: Data Definitions and Estimates Of Persistent Poverty For 2mentioning
confidence: 99%