2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.10.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inequality, Democracy, and Institutions: A Critical Review of Recent Research

Abstract: This paper surveys the theoretical and empirical literature on the effect of economic and political inequality on institutions. The current understanding suggests that unequal societies develop exploitative and inefficient institutions. Empirical research-which is scant, and has mainly concentrated at cross-national level-supports, to some extent, the existence of an inverse relationship between inequality and institutions, but more analysis is needed. Future empirical research should undertake country, state,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
50
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to construct an index ranging from zero to one, two methods were considered. The first is calculated as the simple difference between the number of those who answered "tend to trust" minus those who answered "tend to nottrust" as a percentage of the total population interviewed, 12 For a more detailed review of the literature and theoretical implications, see Savoia et al (2010). 13 See note 4.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to construct an index ranging from zero to one, two methods were considered. The first is calculated as the simple difference between the number of those who answered "tend to trust" minus those who answered "tend to nottrust" as a percentage of the total population interviewed, 12 For a more detailed review of the literature and theoretical implications, see Savoia et al (2010). 13 See note 4.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is further confounded by the unique experience of countries such as in Asian region that display low income inequality and low-rating democratic institutions, and in Latin America whose higher-rating democratic institutions are not matched with an improved income distribution (Savoia et al 2010). In general, the empirical findings of the democracy-inequality studies are mixed, divided between mostly negative and no impact, and some results are argued as not robust due to various econometric issues including endogenous of democracy, omitted variable bias, measurement error and unobserved heterogeneity.…”
Section: Inequality and Democracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Savoia and colleagues [15] attributed the disparity of wealth to a lack of market economy institutions amongst the nations in the global south. They noted that countries possessing stable market economy institutions experience prosperity, while those that do not experience this stability had increased poverty [15].…”
Section: Understanding Social Inequalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Savoia and colleagues [15] attributed the disparity of wealth to a lack of market economy institutions amongst the nations in the global south. They noted that countries possessing stable market economy institutions experience prosperity, while those that do not experience this stability had increased poverty [15]. As economic imbalance between developed countries and developing countries continue, a significant disparity throughout all regions of the world persists because developing countries have not been allowed to catch up.…”
Section: Understanding Social Inequalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation