2003
DOI: 10.1093/cesifo/49.4.527
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inequality and Economic Growth: A Global View Based on Measures of Pay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
1
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
33
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to improve the quality of work on inequalities, it is therefore necessary to be able to carry out modelling with weaker asumptions about the variables, especially to avoid serial dependencies in measurement errors. Galbraith and Kum (2003) found a solution to these difficulties by suggesting a new inequality estimator called EHII (Estimation of the Household Inequality and Inequity). The advantage of this indicator is that it covers a large number of countries over a longer period than Deininger and Squire's (1996) database 4 .…”
Section: Justification Of the Choice Of Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to improve the quality of work on inequalities, it is therefore necessary to be able to carry out modelling with weaker asumptions about the variables, especially to avoid serial dependencies in measurement errors. Galbraith and Kum (2003) found a solution to these difficulties by suggesting a new inequality estimator called EHII (Estimation of the Household Inequality and Inequity). The advantage of this indicator is that it covers a large number of countries over a longer period than Deininger and Squire's (1996) database 4 .…”
Section: Justification Of the Choice Of Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Published papers and books include Conceição and Galbraith 1999, Conceição, Galbraith and Bradford 2001, Galbraith and Berner 2001, Galbraith and Kum 2003, Galbraith and Garcilazo 2004, Kim 2002, Galbraith, Krytynskaia and Wang 2004, Galbraith, RoyChowdhury and Shrivastava, 2004, Galbraith and Hale 2006, Galbraith, Pinto and Spagnolo 2007, Galbraith and Garza Cantu 1999, Galbraith and Ferguson 1999, Galbraith, Spagnolo and Munevar 2008, Galbraith 1998, 1999a, 1999b, 2007a, 2007b, 2007c. Second, sector and regional data yield richly detailed information concerning the precise pattern of winners and losers as inequality changes.…”
Section: Figure 1 Measures Of Inequality In the Oecd From Deininger mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This section is adapted from Galbraith and Kum (2003). Overall this discussion relates mainly to the OECD.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first and last observed years for each country are also denoted. Conceiçao and Galbraith (2001) and Galbraith and Kum (2003) have already remarked that some of the readings -such as lower inequality for Spain (ESP) than for Sweden (SWE), such as France (FRA) as the most unequal country in Europe but with a huge leveling of incomes over time, such as steadily falling inequality in Italy --would raise the eyebrows of any informed observer. To see this point closely, we review the source characteristics of the D&S data as shown in Table 2.…”
Section: The Comparability Problem In Deininger and Squirementioning
confidence: 99%