2016
DOI: 10.1215/17358787-3649524
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inequalities on the spectral radius and the operator norm of Hadamard products of positive operators on sequence spaces

Abstract: have proved inequalities on the spectral radius and the operator norm of Hadamard products and ordinary matrix products of finite and infinite non-negative matrices that define operators on sequence spaces. In the current paper we extend and refine several of these results and also prove some analogues for the numerical radius. Some inequalities seem to be new even in the case of n × n non-negative matrices.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

6
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [39], X. Zhan conjectured that, for non-negative n × n matrices A and B, These inequalities were established via a trace description of the spectral radius. Soon after, inequality (1.1) was reproved, generalized and refined in different ways by several authors ( [18], [19], [32], [33], [29], [7], [13], [30], [31]). Using the fact that the Hadamard product is a principal submatrix of the Kronecker product, R.A. Horn and F. Zhang proved in [18] the inequalities…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [39], X. Zhan conjectured that, for non-negative n × n matrices A and B, These inequalities were established via a trace description of the spectral radius. Soon after, inequality (1.1) was reproved, generalized and refined in different ways by several authors ( [18], [19], [32], [33], [29], [7], [13], [30], [31]). Using the fact that the Hadamard product is a principal submatrix of the Kronecker product, R.A. Horn and F. Zhang proved in [18] the inequalities…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly to [14], we can prove the following max-plus version of [14, Corollary 3.5, Theorem 3.9, Corollary 3.10]. In the proof it is useful to switch to the isomorphic max-times algebra setting by using the equality ν(A) = log µ(B), where B denotes a non-negative n × n matrix B = [e a ij ] and µ(B) denotes the largest max-times eigenvalue of B.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The matrix A admits several max-row partitions (max-column partitions of A T ), including the partition {(1), (3), (2, 4))}, which is also a max-column partition of B. The chosen maximal elements in the rows of A (in ascending order) are a 24 , a 33 , a 41 , a 13 , and the chosen maximal elements in the columns of B are b 43 , b 11 , b 22 , b 14 :…”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note also that a positive cone Z = Y + of each Banach lattice Y or, in particular, of each Banach function space (see e.g. [1], [3], [37], [32], [13], [33] and the references cited there) satisfies these properties. For the theory of cones, wedges, linear and non-linear operators on cones and wedges, Banach ordered spaces, Banach function spaces, vector and Banach lattices and applications e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%