2013
DOI: 10.1136/jech-2013-202608
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inequalities in self-rated health in Japan 1986–2007 according to household income and a novel occupational classification: national sampling survey series

Abstract: Relative and absolute health inequalities for social class and income based on self-rated fair or poor health narrowed or remained stable between 1986 and 2007, despite the economic stagnation and adverse social changes. Overall population health across socioeconomic groups initially improved but then worsened. The positive finding regarding the health inequality trend seen in the Japanese context is informative for the wider international community during this period of economic uncertainty.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
24
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
3
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1988 survey was coded 1, 1999 11 and so on, to account for the different time intervals between surveys. The model was adjusted for age in addition to year and education rank [40], [41].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1988 survey was coded 1, 1999 11 and so on, to account for the different time intervals between surveys. The model was adjusted for age in addition to year and education rank [40], [41].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stable or narrowing inequality trends may be related to health changes caused by different factors that affect groups according to their income. 20 It seems that the decrease in absolute inequality is due to the improvement of oral health among all income groups. The unchanged relative inequality might be due to the fact that self-reported oral health improved more among the better-off than among the poor, potentially due to economic and social changes during this period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These scores were then fitted as continuous explanatory variables and the coefficient represented the absolute difference in mean PWV between the lowest (score 1) to the highest level (score 0) of the SES indicator. The strength of the SII is its ability to provide a single summary measure of health disparity, including direction and magnitude, using all data [22]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%