2022
DOI: 10.1332/175982721x16605972092524
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inequalities in receipt of long-term care services by disabled or older people and co-resident carer dyads in England

Abstract: Internationally, many care-recipients and unpaid carers are not receiving the services they need to live full and independent lives, representing substantial social injustice. We explored unmet need and inequalities in receipt of long-term care services in England. Methods comprised in-depth interviews and secondary analysis of UK Household Longitudinal Study dyad data from 2017/2019. We found widespread unmet need for services overall and inequalities by sex, ethnicity, income, and area deprivation. Aspects o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Systems theory has been used to understand and examine complex interventions, and how to evaluate them, and has been applied to service environments such as those we are discussing here, where multiple services (for example social work, education, mental health and voluntary sector organisations) and multiple individuals may be involved and affected. Brimblecombe and colleagues have emphasised the importance of taking a carer-inclusive approach when thinking about the unmet needs of individuals [55], while also considering the broader contexts which place constraints on the actions of all members of what has been termed the 'care triad' of care recipient, unpaid carer and practitioner: a contextual triadic approach [38]. These contexts include front-line practitioners in contact with families, local authorities, and national government; provision of care is 'rationed', despite policy support for meeting needs, at all these different contextual levels, as Arksey has argued [56].…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Systems theory has been used to understand and examine complex interventions, and how to evaluate them, and has been applied to service environments such as those we are discussing here, where multiple services (for example social work, education, mental health and voluntary sector organisations) and multiple individuals may be involved and affected. Brimblecombe and colleagues have emphasised the importance of taking a carer-inclusive approach when thinking about the unmet needs of individuals [55], while also considering the broader contexts which place constraints on the actions of all members of what has been termed the 'care triad' of care recipient, unpaid carer and practitioner: a contextual triadic approach [38]. These contexts include front-line practitioners in contact with families, local authorities, and national government; provision of care is 'rationed', despite policy support for meeting needs, at all these different contextual levels, as Arksey has argued [56].…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%