1995
DOI: 10.2307/2154966
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inequalities for Zero-Balanced Hypergeometric Functions

Abstract: Abstract.The authors study certain monotoneity and convexity properties of the Gaussian hypergeometric function and those of the Euler gamma function.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Anderson et al [3] used the monotonicity of f 1 to prove that the function g 1 (x) = x 1/2 (e/x) x Γ(x) is decreasing on (0, ∞), and that g 2 (x) = x(e/x) x Γ(x) is increasing on (0, ∞). The following theorem provides a slight extension of these results.…”
Section: Theorem 1 Let α Be a Real Number The Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Anderson et al [3] used the monotonicity of f 1 to prove that the function g 1 (x) = x 1/2 (e/x) x Γ(x) is decreasing on (0, ∞), and that g 2 (x) = x(e/x) x Γ(x) is increasing on (0, ∞). The following theorem provides a slight extension of these results.…”
Section: Theorem 1 Let α Be a Real Number The Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There exists a very extensive literature on the gamma function. In particular, numerous remarkable inequalities involving Γ and its logarithmic derivative ψ = Γ /Γ have been published by different authors; see, e.g., [2], [3], [6], [7], [9], [12], [13], [18]- [27], [29]- [33], [35]- [46], [50]. Many of these inequalities follow immediately from the monotonicity properties of functions which are closely related to Γ and ψ.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…is strictly decreasing for u > 0 (see Theorem 3.2 (2) of Anderson et al (1995)), and by the definition of (2),…”
Section: Is Bounded) the Results (I) Follows From (A3)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now, we know that, given p > 0, Γ(z)Γ(z + 2p)/Γ 2 (z + p) is strictly decreasing for z > 0 (see Theorem 10 of Alzer (1997)), and that z 1−z e z Γ(z) > 1 is strictly increasing for z > 0 (see Theorem 3.2 (2) of Anderson et al (1995)). Then, for any ρ ≥ c and γ ̸ = 0 (in this case, α γ (ρ) + q − 1/γ > 0), we use (A1) and Lemma B.2 to get…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%