1971
DOI: 10.4064/sm-37-3-245-276
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inequalities for Fourier transforms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although probably not best possible, in the case q = 2, the constant K q can be taken to be K q = 2, see the proof of Theorem 4.6 in [36].…”
Section: Theorem Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although probably not best possible, in the case q = 2, the constant K q can be taken to be K q = 2, see the proof of Theorem 4.6 in [36].…”
Section: Theorem Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof: Since T if of type (1, ∞) and (2, 2), [8,Theorem 4.6] shows that there exists a D depending only on T such that (…”
Section: Sufficient Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We say it is of type (1, ∞) and (2, 2). In [8], Jodeit and Torchinsky showed that a map T is of type (1, ∞) and (2, 2) if and only if there is a constant D such that…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modular inequalities, like the norm inequalities, take an important role in analysis. For instance, the modular inequalities for the Fourier transform were obtained in [22]; modular versions of the Hardy-Littlewood maximal inequalities were discussed in [23] and [2]; Carro et al proved the modular inequalities for the Calderón operators and the Hardy operators in [6]. Most recently, the modular inequalities for the Laplace transform, the Hankel transform and the oscillatory integral operators were investigated in [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%