1978
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.18.1228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inelastic scattering of 40 MeV protons fromMg24. II. Microscopic calculations for positive parity states

Abstract: Proton inelastic scattering data at 40 MeV bombarding energy are compared to microscopic distorted-wave Born-approximation'calculations for positive parity states in Mg utilizing shell-model wave functions spanning the full 2sld shell basis. Both empirical forces and forces derived from free nucleon-nucleon potentials are used in the calculations. Except for four transitions for which strong coupling effects are evident, the agreement between theory and experiment is quite good. Enhancement factor's extracted … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus the mismatch between the analysing power data and the predictions would again appear to be evidence of an incomplete description of the reaction mechanism rather than flaws in the spectroscopy. Indeed, the recent analyses of inelastic proton scattering data by Lombard et al (1978) and Zwieglinski et al (1978) suggest that a coupled channels approach will be required before such discrepancies may be resolved, for quite good results were obtained by using an asymmetric rotational model for the interaction form factors in coupled channels calculations. Even so, a number of problems remained, not the least of which were poor fits to K = 2 band state excitation data in both magnitude and shape, and the need to use a large spin-orbit potential deformation to get fits to the analysing power data for ground state band transitions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Thus the mismatch between the analysing power data and the predictions would again appear to be evidence of an incomplete description of the reaction mechanism rather than flaws in the spectroscopy. Indeed, the recent analyses of inelastic proton scattering data by Lombard et al (1978) and Zwieglinski et al (1978) suggest that a coupled channels approach will be required before such discrepancies may be resolved, for quite good results were obtained by using an asymmetric rotational model for the interaction form factors in coupled channels calculations. Even so, a number of problems remained, not the least of which were poor fits to K = 2 band state excitation data in both magnitude and shape, and the need to use a large spin-orbit potential deformation to get fits to the analysing power data for ground state band transitions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even so, a number of problems remained, not the least of which were poor fits to K = 2 band state excitation data in both magnitude and shape, and the need to use a large spin-orbit potential deformation to get fits to the analysing power data for ground state band transitions. However, with 20· 3 MeV incident energy, higher order processes in which the giant resonances of 24Mg act as doorway states (Geramb et al 1975) are significant,and this is evident by the tendency of the analysing powers from weak transitions to have a symmetry about 90° in the centre of mass system, by the large angle enhancement in weak transitions and by the larger scale factors required in the 20· 3 MeV analysis (Lombard et al 1978) when compared with those in the 40 MeV analysis (Zwieglinski et al 1978).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The band structure of 24 Mg has been studied via electromagnetic transitions [1][2][3], and intensively investigated through inelastic scattering of various probes, including electrons [4][5][6][7][8][9][10], pions [11], nucleons [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23], 3 He [24,25], and α [25][26][27][28][29]. For inelastic hadron scattering off 24 Mg, detailed reaction analyses have been performed using the distorted-wave Born approximation (DWBA) and coupled-channel (CC) calculations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%