1965
DOI: 10.1016/0029-5582(65)90547-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inelastic proton scattering (II). Ti50 and Fe54

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
8
1

Year Published

1965
1965
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The calculated results of nat Fe(p, x) 54 Mn reaction cross-sections are higher than experimental data for energies from 35 to 50 MeV, and are lower than experimental data for energy above 65 MeV. The calculated results of nat Fe(p, x) 51 Cr reaction cross-sections are in good agreement with experimental data for energy below 100 MeV, and higher than experimental data for energy above 100 MeV, where there is contribution of 56 Fe(p, x) 51 Cr reaction.…”
Section: Theoretical Results and Analysiscontrasting
confidence: 45%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The calculated results of nat Fe(p, x) 54 Mn reaction cross-sections are higher than experimental data for energies from 35 to 50 MeV, and are lower than experimental data for energy above 65 MeV. The calculated results of nat Fe(p, x) 51 Cr reaction cross-sections are in good agreement with experimental data for energy below 100 MeV, and higher than experimental data for energy above 100 MeV, where there is contribution of 56 Fe(p, x) 51 Cr reaction.…”
Section: Theoretical Results and Analysiscontrasting
confidence: 45%
“…The calculated results are in good agreement with experimental data. The calculated results of elastic scattering angular distributions for p+ 54 Fe reactions are compared with experimental data [33,34,37,39,41,42,46,[49][50][51][52][53][54] based on this set of optical model potential parameter obtained here. The calculated results are in very good agreement with experimental data as shown in Figs.…”
Section: Theoretical Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations