Inelastic electron scattering from<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mprescripts /><mml:mrow /><mml:mrow><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow /><mml:mrow /></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:mrow></mml:math>

Millener, D.J.; Sober, D. I.; Crannell, H.; O’Brien, J. T.; Fagg, L.W.; Kowalski, S.; Williamson, C. F.; Lapikás, L.

doi:10.1103/physrevc.39.14

Cited by 53 publications

(43 citation statements)

References 55 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…There have been many such calculations since then with refined effective interactions, but the wave functions for the lowest positive-parity states remain essentially unchanged. We show the ones obtained in the work done by Millener et al [58], which, as seen from Table IV, yield spectroscopic factors that are ∼ 30 − 60% larger than the measured ones.…”

Section: C and 11 Be Within The Quasiparticle-core Modelmentioning

confidence: 51%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Pairing correlations in odd-mass carbon isotopes and effect of Pauli principle in particle–core coupling in 13C and 11Be

et al. 2007

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We present an exploratory study of structure of 13 C, 15 C, 17 C and 19 C, showing that the simple one-quasiparticle projected BCS (PBCS) model is capable to account for several important properties of these nuclei. Next we discuss the importance of the Pauli Principle in the particle-core models of normal-parity states in 13 C and 11 Be. This is done by considering the pairing interaction between nucleons moving in an over-all deformed potential. To assess the importance of pairing correlations in these light nuclei we use both the simple BCS and the PBCS approximations. We show that the Pauli Principle plays a crucial role in the parity inversion in 11 Be. It is also found that the effect of the particle number conservation in relatively light and/or exotic nuclei is quite significant. Comparison of our results with several recent papers on the same subject, as well as with some experimental data, is presented.

show abstract

Section: C and 11 Be Within The Quasiparticle-core Modelmentioning

confidence: 51%

“…In all our calculations (PRM, QPRM, and PQPRM) we adopt β = −0.60. [7] |0.144| |0.894| |0.424| 0.80 PRM [9] |0.565| |0.831| |0.538| 0.69 SM [58] ? 0.897 −0.357 0.80…”

Section: C and 11 Be Within The Quasiparticle-core Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%

Pairing correlations in odd-mass carbon isotopes and effect of Pauli principle in particle–core coupling in 13C and 11Be

et al. 2007

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Refs. [1,2], predict a dominant contribution from the 2 + 1 ⊗ d 5/2 configuration built on the 4.44 MeV 2 + excited state of the 12 C core. However, the wave function of this state is expected to contain a small (of the order of 1 %) contribution from the 0 + 1 ⊗ g 9/2 configuration as well as larger components built on the 4 + 1 excited state of the 12 C core.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Strong multistep interference effects inC12(d,p)to the9/2
Keeley
¹
,
Kemper
²
,
Rusek
³

2015
Phys. Rev. C
4
0
2
0
View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The population of the 9.50 MeV 9/2 + 1 resonance in 13 C by single neutron transfer reactions is expected to be dominated by the two-step route through the 12 C 2 + 1 (4.44 MeV) state, with another possible contribution via the strongly excited 3 − 1 (9.64 MeV) resonance in 12 C. However, we find that a good description of the angular distribution for population of this state via the 12 C(d,p) 13 C reaction is only possible when both direct 0 + 1 ⊗ g 9/2 and two-step (via the 4.44 MeV 12 C 2 + 1 state) 2 + 1 ⊗ d 5/2 paths are included in a coupled reaction channel calculation. While the calculated angular distribution is almost insensitive to the presence of the two-step path via the 9.64 MeV 12 C 3 − 1 resonance, despite a much greater contribution to the wave function from the 3 − 1 ⊗ f 7/2 configuration, its inclusion is required to fit the details of the experimental angular distribution.The very large interference between the various components of the calculations, even when these are small, arises through the "kinematic" effect associated with the different transfer routes.

show abstract

“…We can distinguish two different types of the electron scattering: the first type is called elastic electron scattering where the nucleus is left on its ground state. The second is inelastic electron scattering where the nucleus is left in its different excited states [3].Gibson [4] has been study the ground state of the 4 He nucleus using a single-particle phenomenological model. Wave functions were generated from a potential whose parameters are chosen to reproduce the correct neutron separation energy.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Investigation of the Nuclear Structure for Some p-Shell Nuclei by Harmonic Oscillator and Woods-Saxon Potentials

Abdullah

2017

JNUS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The single particle radial wave functions of harmonic oscillator potential and Woods-Saxon potential have been used to calculate the charge density distributions, charge form factor and the matter and charge root mean square (rms) radii for some odd-A 1p shell nuclei, namely 9 IntroductionThe charge density distribution has been well studied experimentally over a wide range of nuclei because it is one of the many most important quantities in the nuclear structure [1]. The important information about the nuclear structure is obtained from the high energy electron scattering by the nuclei. At high energy, in the range of 100 MeV and more, the electron represents a best probe to study the nuclear structure because with these energies the de Broglie wavelength will be in the range of the spatial extension of the target nucleus [2]. We can distinguish two different types of the electron scattering: the first type is called elastic electron scattering where the nucleus is left on its ground state. The second is inelastic electron scattering where the nucleus is left in its different excited states [3].Gibson [4] has been study the ground state of the 4 He nucleus using a single-particle phenomenological model. Wave functions were generated from a potential whose parameters are chosen to reproduce the correct neutron separation energy. Ridha [5] has been used the single-particle radial wave functions of Woods-Saxon potential and harmonicoscillator potential to study the nuclear charge density distributions, form factors and corresponding proton, charge, neutron, and

show abstract

Inelastic electron scattering fromC13

Cited by 53 publications

References 55 publications

Pairing correlations in odd-mass carbon isotopes and effect of Pauli principle in particle–core coupling in 13C and 11Be

Pairing correlations in odd-mass carbon isotopes and effect of Pauli principle in particle–core coupling in 13C and 11Be

Strong multistep interference effects inC12(d,p)to the9/2
Keeley
¹
,
Kemper
²
,
Rusek
³

2015
Phys. Rev. C
4
0
2
0
View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Investigation of the Nuclear Structure for Some p-Shell Nuclei by Harmonic Oscillator and Woods-Saxon Potentials

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Inelastic electron scattering fromC13

Cited by 53 publications

References 55 publications

Pairing correlations in odd-mass carbon isotopes and effect of Pauli principle in particle–core coupling in 13C and 11Be

Pairing correlations in odd-mass carbon isotopes and effect of Pauli principle in particle–core coupling in 13C and 11Be

Strong multistep interference effects inC12(d,p)to the9/2Keeley1, Kemper2, Rusek3 2015Phys. Rev. C4020View full textAdd to dashboardCite

Investigation of the Nuclear Structure for Some p-Shell Nuclei by Harmonic Oscillator and Woods-Saxon Potentials

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Strong multistep interference effects inC12(d,p)to the9/2
Keeley
¹
,
Kemper
²
,
Rusek
³

2015
Phys. Rev. C
4
0
2
0
View full text Add to dashboard Cite