1983
DOI: 10.1088/0031-8949/1983/t5/010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inelastic Electron Scattering, Fine Structure of M1 Giant Resonances and Gamow-Teller States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Information about energy-dependent dipole strength functions can be obtained from data on multi-step gammadecays following n-capture [17] or direct reactions [12], from inelastic electron scattering [18] or elastic photon scattering [14,15,19]. For the region above the n-threshold the electromagnetic strength in a very large number of stable nuclei has been experimentally determined by observing the neutrons emitted after the excitation by quasimonochromatic photons [5,20].…”
Section: Nuclear Resonance Fluorescencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Information about energy-dependent dipole strength functions can be obtained from data on multi-step gammadecays following n-capture [17] or direct reactions [12], from inelastic electron scattering [18] or elastic photon scattering [14,15,19]. For the region above the n-threshold the electromagnetic strength in a very large number of stable nuclei has been experimentally determined by observing the neutrons emitted after the excitation by quasimonochromatic photons [5,20].…”
Section: Nuclear Resonance Fluorescencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is why an average level density in its dependence on the excitation energy can only be determined from a fluctuation analysis on the basis of PorterThomas statistics [18]. Similarly, the dipole strength in a certain energy interval has to be obtained by integrating the complete nrf-spectra -i.e.…”
Section: Level Densities and Fluctuating Cross Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resultant 2M1 strengths supply an independent measurement of the Ml quenching factors deduced from recent (e,e f ) and (p,p f ) experiments. 3 The 0+ first excited states 4 of 40 Ca (E 0 = 335 MeV, r 1/2 = 2.1 ns) and 90 Zr (#0=1.76 MeV, Ty 2 = 62 ns) were populated via known (p,p') resonances at ^ = 5.08 MeV and ^ = 7.08 MeV, respectively, with use of a pulsed beam (0.5 ns width) supplied by the Emperor accelerator of the Max-Planck-Institut. Inelastic protons were detected at backward angles in four surface-barrier detectors, each subtending a solid angle of 0.17 sr; they were mounted together with the metallic targets ( 40 Ca: 0.3 mg/cm 2 , 99.97%; 90 Zr: 0.7 mg/cm 2 , 97%) in the center of the "crystal ball" (CB) detector.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information about energy dependent dipole strength functions can be obtained from data on multi-step gammadecays following n-capture [17] or direct reactions [12], from inelastic electron scattering [18] or elastic photon scattering [14,15,19]. For the region above the n-threshold the electromagnetic strength in a very large number of stable nuclei has been experimentally determined by observing the neutrons emitted after the excitation by quasimonochromatic photons [5,20].…”
Section: Nuclear Resonance Fluorescencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high level density in combination with Porter-Thomas fluctuations cause a large portion of the strength to appear in many weak transitions which are likely to be missed experimentally. This is why an average level density in its dependence on the excitation energy can only be determined from a fluctuation analysis on the basis of Porter-Thomas statistics [18]. Similarly, the dipole strength in a certain energy interval has to be obtained by integrating the complete nrf spectra -i.e.…”
Section: Level Densities and Fluctuating Cross Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%