2006
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.552
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inelastic displacement ratios for evaluation of structures built on soft soil sites

Abstract: SUMMARYThis paper summarizes the results of a comprehensive statistical study aimed at evaluating peak lateral inelastic displacement demands of structures with known lateral strength and sti ness built on soft soil site conditions. For that purpose, empirical information on inelastic displacement ratios which are deÿned as the ratio of peak lateral inelastic displacement demands to peak elastic displacement demands are investigated. Inelastic displacement ratios were computed from the response of singledegree… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

7
61
0
8

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
7
61
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…In this respect, many studies have focused on the prediction of maximum displacements in steel structures employing generic multi-storey frames [17,30] as well as equivalent single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) systems [3,32,37]. Although the idealization of a multi degree of freedom structure as a SDOF system entails the neglection of a number of dynamic phenomena such as the contribution of higher modes, it has been recognised that equivalent SDOF models can provide a good basis for the estimation of global demands in building structures [27,31,35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this respect, many studies have focused on the prediction of maximum displacements in steel structures employing generic multi-storey frames [17,30] as well as equivalent single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) systems [3,32,37]. Although the idealization of a multi degree of freedom structure as a SDOF system entails the neglection of a number of dynamic phenomena such as the contribution of higher modes, it has been recognised that equivalent SDOF models can provide a good basis for the estimation of global demands in building structures [27,31,35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even those studies that include varying levels of pinched response remain typically interested in reinforced concrete structures where important levels of strength deterioration are normally observed [14,33,37]. However, such levels of concurrent pinching and deterioration differ notably from the pinched hysteresis of typical PR steel systems where no significant deterioration in strength is evident up to considerably high levels of deformation demand [11,20,26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of strength softening was investigated by Miranda and Akkar (2003). Finally, RuizGarcia and Miranda (2004Miranda ( , 2006 developed inelastic displacement ratio plots for structures on soft soils. It is worth mentioning that in all the research work conducted by collapse potential was not considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Xu and Xie (2004) and Ziotopoulou and Gazetas (2010) proposed that the periods of an acceleration response spectrum should be normalised with respect to the spectral predominant period (corresponding to peak ordinate) in order to capture the peak spectral response. Similar suggestions have been made to improve the velocity (e.g., Mavroeidis et al, 2004;Xu and Xie, 2007) and displacement (Maniatakis and Spyrakos, 2012) response spectra, and also to modify the ductility reduction factor (e.g., Miranda and Bertero, 1994;Miranda and Ruiz-Garcia, 2002;Gillie et al, 2010), and inelastic displacement ratio (e.g., Miranda, 2000;Ruiz-García and Miranda, 2006;Iervolino et al, 2012) for nonlinear systems. However, all of these studies were restricted to fixed-base building systems and, therefore, the effects of soil-structure interaction (SSI) were not considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%