2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00707-017-1995-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inelastic anisotropic constitutive models based on evolutionary linear transformations on stress tensors with application to masonry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For what follows, it is important that Equation (12a) is extended as: trueF(bold-italicσtrue‾,κ)goodbreak=FI()bold-italicσbold-italicI,bold-italicκbold-italicI1.75embold-italicκ$$ \overline{F}\left(\overline{\boldsymbol{\sigma}},\boldsymbol{\kappa} \right)={F}^I\left({\boldsymbol{\sigma}}^{\boldsymbol{I}},{\boldsymbol{\kappa}}^{\boldsymbol{I}}\right)\kern1.75em \forall \boldsymbol{\kappa} $$ Equality (17) can be achieved with an arbitrary yield function FI$$ {F}^I $$ if the relationship κI(κ)$$ {\boldsymbol{\kappa}}^{\boldsymbol{I}}\left(\boldsymbol{\kappa} \right) $$ is selected appropriately and the tensor bold-italicA$$ \boldsymbol{A} $$ is governed by a suitable evolution law bold-italicAbold-italic=bold-italicA(κ)bold-italic.$$ \boldsymbol{A}=\boldsymbol{A}\left(\boldsymbol{\kappa} \right). $$ 46 In this work, given the scarce experimental evidence on the evolution of the homogenized masonry yield function, the approach has been simplified by selecting a suitable isotropic yield function, largely used for simulating concrete and masonry behavior, and assuming constant bold-italicA$$ \boldsymbol{A} $$ and the identity κIbold-italic=bold-italicκ$$ {\boldsymbol{\kappa}}^{\boldsymbol{I}}=\boldsymbol{\kappa} $$. This allows for significant simplifications in the formulation of the model.…”
Section: The Materials Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For what follows, it is important that Equation (12a) is extended as: trueF(bold-italicσtrue‾,κ)goodbreak=FI()bold-italicσbold-italicI,bold-italicκbold-italicI1.75embold-italicκ$$ \overline{F}\left(\overline{\boldsymbol{\sigma}},\boldsymbol{\kappa} \right)={F}^I\left({\boldsymbol{\sigma}}^{\boldsymbol{I}},{\boldsymbol{\kappa}}^{\boldsymbol{I}}\right)\kern1.75em \forall \boldsymbol{\kappa} $$ Equality (17) can be achieved with an arbitrary yield function FI$$ {F}^I $$ if the relationship κI(κ)$$ {\boldsymbol{\kappa}}^{\boldsymbol{I}}\left(\boldsymbol{\kappa} \right) $$ is selected appropriately and the tensor bold-italicA$$ \boldsymbol{A} $$ is governed by a suitable evolution law bold-italicAbold-italic=bold-italicA(κ)bold-italic.$$ \boldsymbol{A}=\boldsymbol{A}\left(\boldsymbol{\kappa} \right). $$ 46 In this work, given the scarce experimental evidence on the evolution of the homogenized masonry yield function, the approach has been simplified by selecting a suitable isotropic yield function, largely used for simulating concrete and masonry behavior, and assuming constant bold-italicA$$ \boldsymbol{A} $$ and the identity κIbold-italic=bold-italicκ$$ {\boldsymbol{\kappa}}^{\boldsymbol{I}}=\boldsymbol{\kappa} $$. This allows for significant simplifications in the formulation of the model.…”
Section: The Materials Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equality ( 17) can be achieved with an arbitrary yield function F I if the relationship 𝜿 I (𝜿) is selected appropriately and the tensor A is governed by a suitable evolution law A = A(𝜿). 46 In this work, given the scarce experimental evidence on the evolution of the homogenized masonry yield function, the approach has been simplified by selecting a suitable isotropic yield function, largely used for simulating concrete and masonry behavior, and assuming constant A and the identity 𝜿 I = 𝜿. This allows for significant simplifications in the formulation of the model.…”
Section: Anisotropic Model Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Applications of the Discrete Element Method can also be included in this category (Lemos, 2007;Baraldi, et al, 2018). Macroscale descriptions encompass i) generic finite element representations utilising several nonlinear continuum 2D plane stress/3D solid elements Berto, et al, 2002;Pelà, et al, 2011;Fu, et al, 2018;Gatta, et al, 2018) for modelling each masonry structural part, and ii) simplified models with macro-elements (Lagomarsino, et al, 2013;Pantò, et al, 2016), where different URM structural components (e.g. pier, spandrel etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%