2011
DOI: 10.3386/w17299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inefficient Provision of Liquidity

Abstract: We study an economy where the lack of a simultaneous double coincidence of wants creates the need for a relatively safe asset (money). We show that, even in the absence of asymmetric information or an agency problem, the private provision of liquidity is inefficient. The reason is that liquidity affects prices and the welfare of others, and creators do not internalize this. This distortion is present even if we introduce lending and government money. To eliminate the inefficiency the government must restrict t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We analyze this case in a simplified setting in Hart and Zingales (2011), and show that our results generalize. In particular, lending does not resolve the tension between private and social objectives.…”
Section: An Extensionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…We analyze this case in a simplified setting in Hart and Zingales (2011), and show that our results generalize. In particular, lending does not resolve the tension between private and social objectives.…”
Section: An Extensionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…InterestinglyDobbie and Skiba (2013) find evidence of what might be termed advantageous moral hazard for a payday lender: a larger loan size reduces default, all else equal. 15 See alsoHart and Zingales (2011), where increasing collateralized debt increases the price of whatever good is being financed with the debt, generating a negative externality on other borrowers/consumers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is the ability to finance their loan and investment portfolios by issuing liabilities that serve as a generally accepted means of payment, i.e. money (Hart & Zingales, 2011;OECD, 2017). Furthermore, bank deposits do not represent real savings (i.e.…”
Section: Role Of Banks In Creation Of Money and New Purchasing Powermentioning
confidence: 99%