2018
DOI: 10.1080/13691066.2017.1422424
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Industry specialization of private equity firms: a source of buy-out performance heterogeneity

Abstract: This study sheds new light on the industry specialization of private equity (PE) firms as a source of buy-outs' performance and on the conditions under which these firms can add value to the buy-outs in which they invest. Advantages to specialization are based on specific resources and capabilities that confer the PE funds advantages both in the pre-and post-transaction phases. We argue that the magnitude of the advantages to industry specialization will depend on the criticality of these specific resources fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this aspect raises the question whether industry-specialized VC investors are able to outperform generalists and whether existing findings hold in the blockchain context. Existing research shows ambiguous results whether industry-specialized investors outperform generalists (Le Nadant et al 2018). While Hagendorff et al (2009) find no statistically significant relationship between industry specialization and portfolio company success as measured by the number of IPOs, Matusik and Fitza (2012) provide evidence that the relationship between portfolio company success and VC firm industry-specialization follow a U-shape with VCs having a moderate level of diversification showing the lowest performance.…”
Section: Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, this aspect raises the question whether industry-specialized VC investors are able to outperform generalists and whether existing findings hold in the blockchain context. Existing research shows ambiguous results whether industry-specialized investors outperform generalists (Le Nadant et al 2018). While Hagendorff et al (2009) find no statistically significant relationship between industry specialization and portfolio company success as measured by the number of IPOs, Matusik and Fitza (2012) provide evidence that the relationship between portfolio company success and VC firm industry-specialization follow a U-shape with VCs having a moderate level of diversification showing the lowest performance.…”
Section: Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…the specialization of a VC firm relies majorly on past experience in the industry of the respective portfolio firm. Subsequently, Le Nadant et al (2018) provide empirical evidence that investors with experience in the industry of their portfolio companies are more beneficial to their portfolio companies.…”
Section: Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples include PE experience (Alperovych et al, 2013), syndication (Huyghebaert & Priem, 2016), specialization (Le Nadant, Perdreau, & Bruining, 2018) and institutional affiliation (Fang, Ivashina, & Lerner, 2013). We also lack more detailed information on the portfolio companies and their control groups (non-PE or pre-PE in the case of event studies).…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%