2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2021.102191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Industry levy versus banning promotion on soft drinks in Scotland: A distributional analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several other countries, including Hungary, Finland, and France have raised taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages in the past few years. 22 In our study, 62.6% of participants consumed CSDs daily while only 9.8% consumed occasionally. Our results showed students drinking soda on a daily basis had higher scores for anxiety and depression compared with students consuming CSD only occasionally.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 47%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several other countries, including Hungary, Finland, and France have raised taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages in the past few years. 22 In our study, 62.6% of participants consumed CSDs daily while only 9.8% consumed occasionally. Our results showed students drinking soda on a daily basis had higher scores for anxiety and depression compared with students consuming CSD only occasionally.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 47%
“…In a similar effort, the UK government in 2018 introduced a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages, which became known as the CSD industry levy. Several other countries, including Hungary, Finland, and France have raised taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages in the past few years 22…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that no country or jurisdiction has restricted or banned the promotion of discretionary foods, it is difficult to compare our results with findings from previous studies [an exception is ( 9 ), although they only analyse promotions on soft drinks]. However, there is a large literature on the positive effect of price promotions on the purchases of discretionary foods, and there is consistent evidence that promotions are effective in increasing sales (i.e., the effect of applying promotions, not eliminating them).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…A key policy implication that arises from recognition of the strong relationship between environmental factors and obesity is that universal policies that apply to whole population groups, such as taxation, subsidies, regulation, reformulation and labeling are now being more heavily promoted, developed and tested in many countries (5)(6)(7). Recent examples include the introduction of a new tax on sugar-sweetened beverages in the UK from 2018 (8,9). An additional policy being considered in some countries is restrictions (i.e., banning) on the promotion or advertising of foods considered to be high in saturated fat and/or sugar and/or salt (10)(11)(12).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scientific queries on the feasibility analysis of hemp seed and fibers (Aydoğan et al., 2020; Fortenbery & Bennett, 2004; Fortenbery & Mick, 2014; Hanchar, 2019; Schluttenhofer & Yuan, 2017) show regional variability in profit (Dogbe & Revoredo‐Giha, 2022; Johnson, 2013). Additionally, many studies (e.g., Brar et al., 2022; Finnan & Styles, 2013; Prade, 2011; Rehman et al., 2013) are unequivocal about the economic benefit of hemp feedstocks for bioenergy generation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%