2010
DOI: 10.1080/00036840801964666
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Industry competitiveness using Herfindahl and entropy concentration indices with firm market capitalization data

Abstract: While previous studies of industry concentration have traditionally utilized sales or market share data, no studies that we are aware of have been done with market capitalization data. If the markets are successful at valuing a firm's current and future prospects, it can be argued that concentration indices and other metrics based on the market value of the firms in an industry should be a good proxy for market power within an industry. This study presents a study of the market concentration using the Herfinda… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After 2006, the market was un-concentrated; hence evidencing monopolistic competition or effective competition structure (Gwin 2001). Besides, according to Nawrocki and Carter (2010), the entropy measure has been accepted in the economics literature as a measure of competition. The higher the entropy value, the higher the degree of competitiveness.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After 2006, the market was un-concentrated; hence evidencing monopolistic competition or effective competition structure (Gwin 2001). Besides, according to Nawrocki and Carter (2010), the entropy measure has been accepted in the economics literature as a measure of competition. The higher the entropy value, the higher the degree of competitiveness.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the smaller market shares are not given in Table 2 because of space limitation, but were included in the computations. The H, which has been used as a measure of market concentration or rather of its converse, deconcentration (e.g., [28]), would indicate that these two industries have nearly the same market deconcentration. By contrast, when considered in terms of H K for which such comparison is valid because of the value-validity property of H K , the results in Table 2 show that the cell-phone industry is about 20% more deconcentrated than the soft-drink industry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In past academic research, the comparison between the HHI and CR has been subject to some debate. Most comparisons have pointed out the HHI superiority over the M-firm concentration rate (Nawrocki and Carter, 2010). Consequently, for low levels of concentration, non-cooperative behaviour makes little difference for industry performance.…”
Section: Jmbace 113mentioning
confidence: 99%