2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jue.2008.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Industry churning and the evolution of cities: Evidence for Germany

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
42
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
7
42
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…More specifically, while productivity enhancing regional change is more likely to occur in human capital rich regions, social returns to human capital necessitate dynamic labor markets to come about. In line with Suedekum/Findeisen (2008), we find productivity effects from the joint presence of industrial change and aggregate education to be most pronounced in growing industries.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More specifically, while productivity enhancing regional change is more likely to occur in human capital rich regions, social returns to human capital necessitate dynamic labor markets to come about. In line with Suedekum/Findeisen (2008), we find productivity effects from the joint presence of industrial change and aggregate education to be most pronounced in growing industries.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Glaeser/Saiz (2003) argue that a broad human capital base yields benefits first and foremost for declining regions, since it allows for successful industrial change through innovation and thereby over time positively influences the direction of growth. In contrast, Findeisen/Suedekum (2008) find that human capital is a key driver of growth and industrial change only in successful cities, while regional decline is, in contrast, driven by the demise of old industries which can hardly be altered by human capital endowments of whichever intensity.…”
Section: Ii1 the Role Of Aggregate Education For Successful Regionamentioning
confidence: 73%
“…This is consistent with Findeisen and Sudekum (2008), who find that "cities specialized in these fairly "modern" sectors are less likely to change afterwards". It is not consistent, however, with the large change observed for business services 4 .…”
Section: The Fast and The Stillsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Recife has the largest excess churning level, which is perhaps connected to the population decay observed in the last few decades. However, excess churning cannot be correlated with growth, a fact that was made evident by Findeisen and Sudekum (2008).…”
Section: The Fast and The Stillmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is no aggregate structural change at the national level in the model by Duranton (2007), and therefore it is not possible to distinguish whether particular regions develop along with, or against the national trend. Drawing on this work, Findeisen and Suedekum (2008) study the relationship between industry churning and local growth in Germany. They find that many growing regions only exhibit rather modest levels of industry turnover.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%