2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10098-006-0063-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Industry and energy sectors in Flanders: environmental performance and response indicators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PSR, and DSR), is widely accepted and a commonly used framework for interdisciplinary system and model conceptualization, indicator development and integrated assessments (e.g. Block, Gerven, & Vandecasteele, 2007;OECD, 2003;Walmsley, 2002). The DPSIR framework systemises the relationships between humans and the environment in: driving forces that exert pressures on the environment, resulting in a certain state of the environment, that has an impact on humans and society, which may stimulate responses on any of the previous four elements (EEA, 1999;OECD, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PSR, and DSR), is widely accepted and a commonly used framework for interdisciplinary system and model conceptualization, indicator development and integrated assessments (e.g. Block, Gerven, & Vandecasteele, 2007;OECD, 2003;Walmsley, 2002). The DPSIR framework systemises the relationships between humans and the environment in: driving forces that exert pressures on the environment, resulting in a certain state of the environment, that has an impact on humans and society, which may stimulate responses on any of the previous four elements (EEA, 1999;OECD, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In WFAM, selecting the sub elements and influencing factors is done based on various studies, reviewing the literature (Roca and Searcy, 2012;Herva et al, 2011;Tokos et al, 2011;Singh et al, 2009;Okkonen, 2008;Petrie et al, 2007;Block et al, 2007;Jain, 2005;Labuschagne et al, 2005;Khan et al, 2004;Krajnc and Glavic, 2003;Andersson et al, 1998;Ragas et al, 1995) and discussion with the decision makers of GGS. In this case study, owner of the company, chief executive officer, general manager and a system manager were selected as the expert decision makers.…”
Section: Case Study and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measurement of company sustainability with multi indicators provides complexity and is very relevant in the context of continuous assessment [38]. The combination of eco-efficiency indicators, environmental management systems, environmental costs, sustainable energy production, environmental damage costs, environmental levies, and the number of complaints that are included are mixed indicators that provide a good picture of environmental performance and responses from the industrial and energy sectors [12].…”
Section: G Effects Of Corporate Performance On Corporate Sustainabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%