2012 38th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference 2012
DOI: 10.1109/pvsc.2012.6317800
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Industrially feasible casting-mono crystalline solar cells with PECVD AlO<inf>x</inf>/SiN<inf>x</inf> rear passivation stack towards 19.6% efficiency

Abstract: Cost reduction and efficiency gain are the maj or goals of research and development in crystalline silicon solar cell technology. Casting-mono crystalline silicon produces higher cell efficiencies compared to multi-crystalline silicon material with the same average minority carrier lifetime and with a similarly low production cost. Aluminum oxide provides excellent passivation on crystalline solar cell and has received great research interests in recent years due to combination of chemical passivation and fiel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, one can deduce that enhancement does not originate from charge transfer between the nano-Pt layer and Si (chemical enhancement). The Al 2 O 3 thickness dependence of the minority carrier lifetime shown in Figure 4 is consistent with the previous works reported by Sun et al 42 and Saint-Cast et al 43 When the Al 2 O 3 spacer thickness is below 10 nm, an increase of the minority carrier lifetime with the spacer thickness can be attributed to a decrease in the interfacial state density, i.e., the so-called chemical passivation effect. On the other hand, the presence of a net positive oxide charge in the Al 2 O 3 layer can account for a decrease of the minority carrier lifetime with a spacer thickness greater than 10 nm, due to an increase in the minority carrier (electron) concentration in p-type Si near the interface caused by a positive oxide charge in Al 2 O 3 .…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Thus, one can deduce that enhancement does not originate from charge transfer between the nano-Pt layer and Si (chemical enhancement). The Al 2 O 3 thickness dependence of the minority carrier lifetime shown in Figure 4 is consistent with the previous works reported by Sun et al 42 and Saint-Cast et al 43 When the Al 2 O 3 spacer thickness is below 10 nm, an increase of the minority carrier lifetime with the spacer thickness can be attributed to a decrease in the interfacial state density, i.e., the so-called chemical passivation effect. On the other hand, the presence of a net positive oxide charge in the Al 2 O 3 layer can account for a decrease of the minority carrier lifetime with a spacer thickness greater than 10 nm, due to an increase in the minority carrier (electron) concentration in p-type Si near the interface caused by a positive oxide charge in Al 2 O 3 .…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Passivated emitter and rear cell (PERC) silicon solar cell had kept the efficiency record for over ten years [1] and started to be transferred from laboratory to industry at the beginning of 2010. [2][3][4][5][6] The main improvement of PERC is rear-side passivation compared with aluminum back surface field (Al-BSF) silicon solar cells. At the initial stage of industrialization of PERC cells, it has little cost advantage over Al-BSF cells because of high cost of new materials (mainly trimethylaluminum [TMA]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been significant progress in monolike cell technology in the past few years. Cell efficiency of ~20% has been reported for the monolike cells fabricated with standard cell processing techniques [4]. It is anticipated that the efficiency of monolike cells can be further improved after optimizing cell processes [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%