1993
DOI: 10.1006/exeh.1993.1003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Industrialization and the Earnings Gap: Regional and Sectoral Tests of the Goldin-Sokoloff Hypothesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…23 Data from the manufacturing censuses have been used by economic historians to study firm productivity. Craig and Field-Hendrey (1993) used the 1860 census of to compare productivity in Northern and Southern manufacturing to productivity in agriculture. Atack, Bateman, and Margo (2003) used the 1880 census to examine the relationship between output and the length of the working day,…”
Section: And 1860 Census Of Manufacturingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 Data from the manufacturing censuses have been used by economic historians to study firm productivity. Craig and Field-Hendrey (1993) used the 1860 census of to compare productivity in Northern and Southern manufacturing to productivity in agriculture. Atack, Bateman, and Margo (2003) used the 1880 census to examine the relationship between output and the length of the working day,…”
Section: And 1860 Census Of Manufacturingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…XII, ‘Report of Mr. Vaughan on the Counties of Kent, Surrey, and Sussex,’ p. 185. For US agriculture in 1860, Craig and Field‐Hendrey, ‘Industrialization and the earnings gap’, estimates the productivity ratio of females relative to males to be 0.61 in the North, and 0.60 for slaves in the South. In manufacturing, the ratio was 0.50 in the North and 0.44 in the South.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%