Globalizing Social Rights 2013
DOI: 10.1057/9781137291967_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Industrial States and Transnational Exchanges of Social Policies: Belgium and the ILO in the Interwar Period

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…58 Indeed, that strategy was not successful; neither Germany nor Great Britain ever ratified the ILO Hours of Work Convention. 59 In general, ratification could be refused by national Parliaments even though their state representatives had signed a convention and the state already had a national law in accordance with the proposed international standards. Setting of standards, and implementing them into national law, was a complicated process of negotiating the interests of political parties and social partners (the trade unions and the employers).…”
Section: Meeting International Standards: Correspondence Offices and mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…58 Indeed, that strategy was not successful; neither Germany nor Great Britain ever ratified the ILO Hours of Work Convention. 59 In general, ratification could be refused by national Parliaments even though their state representatives had signed a convention and the state already had a national law in accordance with the proposed international standards. Setting of standards, and implementing them into national law, was a complicated process of negotiating the interests of political parties and social partners (the trade unions and the employers).…”
Section: Meeting International Standards: Correspondence Offices and mentioning
confidence: 99%