2022
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4147250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Industrial Robots, Workers' Safety, and Health

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10. In line with this view, Gihleb et al (2020) document that the introduction of robots is associated with significant improvements in industrial workers' health and safety, suggesting that automation can often be a win-win solution for both capitalists and workers. 11.…”
Section: Confounding Regulationsmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…10. In line with this view, Gihleb et al (2020) document that the introduction of robots is associated with significant improvements in industrial workers' health and safety, suggesting that automation can often be a win-win solution for both capitalists and workers. 11.…”
Section: Confounding Regulationsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Previous works suggest that robot usage is often associated with organizational restructuring aimed at improving the health and safety of the workers (e.g. Gihleb et al 2020). To check this, and in particular whether ER favours similar improvements in working conditions, we split the sample depending on the past quality of the task environment.…”
Section: Confounding Regulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the aforementioned benefits, automation makes it possible to perform some tasks that are difficult or impossible to do manually. Many industrial productions involve the use of chemicals or high voltage, creating a dangerous work environment for the labour force (Gihleb et al, 2022). The emergence of automation through the diffusion of industrial robots has transformed production lines, allowing robots to easily handle hazardous work.…”
Section: Industrial Robots and Economic Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, beside the hold-up problem, other arguments have been advanced to support either a positive or negative relationship between robot adoption and the institutions that regulate the labor market. As a first example, robots can contribute to making the workplace safer and reducing the physical effort of workers (Gihleb et al, 2020) and, therefore, there may be circumstances in which employees use their bargaining powerwhich is influenced by labor laws -to push for robot adoption (Belloc et al, 2020). In this regard, Acemoglu and Restrepo (2019b) found that higher unionization is associated with higher robot adoption.…”
Section: Labor Regulation and Determinants Of Robot Adoptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, high levels of labor protection can spur both employees and employers to make complementary investments in human and physical capital, potentially resulting in technological lock-ins that can increase the costs of robot adoption (Milgrom and Roberts, 1990;Aoki, 2001;Antonelli, 2012). Second, to complicate things further, unions can push for robot adoption to increase the safety of the working environment and to ease the physical effort on the part of employees (for the case of blue-collar workers, see Gihleb et al, 2020;Belloc et al, 2020;Caselli et al, 2021). However, if robots displace unskilled and routinary occupations, the increased productivity gap between skilled and unskilled workers may undermine their coalition, reduce the level of unionization, and increase the costs of coordination (Iversen and Soskice, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%