2020 25th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/etfa46521.2020.9211997
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Industrial Robot Programming Methods: A Scoping Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The benefits of assigning cobots to small-batch agile production [81] can be eroded by the requirement for more frequent reprogramming [7], especially if there is a need to continuously hire skilled programmers [12]. However, by simplifying programming and control methods sufficiently, workplace operators, rather than dedicated programmers, could intuitively program the cobots [82]. In this case, there would be greater potential for increased cobot utilisation since the programming role would be open to a broader range of workers.…”
Section: Proposed Cobot Control Methods In Recent Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The benefits of assigning cobots to small-batch agile production [81] can be eroded by the requirement for more frequent reprogramming [7], especially if there is a need to continuously hire skilled programmers [12]. However, by simplifying programming and control methods sufficiently, workplace operators, rather than dedicated programmers, could intuitively program the cobots [82]. In this case, there would be greater potential for increased cobot utilisation since the programming role would be open to a broader range of workers.…”
Section: Proposed Cobot Control Methods In Recent Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To program collaborative robots (robots that are intended for direct human-robot interactions within a shared space) for the previously mentioned types of interaction, different programming approaches exist. We can mainly organize them into two categories: online and offline programming [20]. Online programming is further categorized into two types: teach pendant and lead-through programming [4].…”
Section: Human-robot Interactions For Robot Programmingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As robotic path teaching is a vital task for all robotic applications, the efficiency of the programming method directly affects the production cycle. Online programming (OP) is predominantly used to manually teach, where the input of a trained operator is required to teach the path points in space through a teach pendant [ 2 , 3 ]. This lead-through method requires robotics knowledge to generate kinematics and awareness of possible collision singularities during trajectory planning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This lead-through method requires robotics knowledge to generate kinematics and awareness of possible collision singularities during trajectory planning. Although OP is characterized as a time-consuming method with an unfavorable ratio between programming and production time, it is still used predominantly by Small-to-Medium Enterprises (SMEs) [ 2 , 3 ]. This prevalent method has drawbacks, such as mandatory downtime, as the robot cannot be utilized during programming, and the generated program lacks flexibility, requiring re-programming to accommodate for even slight changes in the same workpiece.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%