2016
DOI: 10.1007/s40812-016-0057-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Industrial policy and the future of manufacturing

Abstract: The paper aims at reconstructing the industrial policy debate by focusing on a number of theoretical issues, in particular the contested nature of industrial policy -its selectivity -also in relation to manufacturing and the different rationales for industrial policy making. The paper concludes by looking ahead into the future of manufacturing and focuses on the need for rethinking our understanding of global production and emerging technologies for increased prosperity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…First, a European industrial policy allowing for development of an export structure with higher added value in countries with a structural deficit would have potentially positive effects on their external balance. This highlights the need to deepen the current debate on the potential benefits of an active industrial policy in Europe, as pointed out by Botta (2014), Mazzucato et al (2015), Andreoni and Chang (2016), Ambroziak (2017), andPeneder (2017).…”
Section: Final Remarksmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…First, a European industrial policy allowing for development of an export structure with higher added value in countries with a structural deficit would have potentially positive effects on their external balance. This highlights the need to deepen the current debate on the potential benefits of an active industrial policy in Europe, as pointed out by Botta (2014), Mazzucato et al (2015), Andreoni and Chang (2016), Ambroziak (2017), andPeneder (2017).…”
Section: Final Remarksmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Actually, applications of such approaches have a wider field than that of technological innovation, and extend to the coordination among various scales of governance (Bianchi and Labory 2011;McCann and Ortega-Argilés 2013). The permanent evolution of the manufacturing sector can be challenging for such multi-scalar policies, as Andreoni and Chang (2016) remark, in terms of, for example: (1) the provision of technological platforms; (2) the reduction of risk for investments in emerging technologies; (3) support to cross-cluster and cross-regional demonstrators and systems of integration; (4) support for the restructuring, sectoral transition and re-building of "diffused industrial competences", i.e. the so-called "industrial commons" reminiscent of the Marshallian industrial atmosphere.…”
Section: Place-based Policies Of Integrated Productive Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Основанные на положениях эволюционной экономики [8]; 2. Опирающиеся на классическуютеорию экономики развития и структуралистские школы [9]; 3. Основанные наидеяхМаршалла и его анализа промышленных кластеров и промышленной политики [обзор в 10];…”
Section: научный диалог: экономика и менеджментunclassified