Industrial Policy and Technology Innovation under the US Trade War against China

Zhang, Kevin Honglin

doi:10.1080/10971475.2020.1730553

Cited by 21 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As a master plan and industrial policy issued in 2015, Made in China 2025(MIC 2025), intents to further develop and upgrade domestic manufacturing sectors comprehensively [18]. Although having already dominated the international manufacturing output in the early 21th century, China was still perceived as the "world factory" which indicates that the majority of products were cheap and lowtech while depending on the abundant low-cost labor forces and supply-chain merits [19]. Nevertheless, the Chinese government is endeavoring to alter this entrenched prejudice by adjusting the focus to the development of technology and innovation.…”

Section: Impact On Chinese Manufacturing and Mic 2025mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Besides targeting at the dominance in domestic market, one underlining purpose of Made in China 2025 plan is to compete for those high-tech market shares which has been monopolized by US along with other major industrialized democracies [20]. Confronting the challenge, Trump administration determined to prioritize the protection of native enterprises and intellectual property [21]. Consequently, a sizable amount of manufactured goods put into the blacklist with high tariffs were those included in the MIC 2025, such as those relating to artificial intelligence [22].…”

Section: Impact On Chinese Manufacturing and Mic 2025mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Impact of the Trade War on Manufacturing and Workers in China and the United States

Zhao¹

2023

HBEM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Nowadays, in global level, United States and China are widely accepted as the first and second largest economies. By calculating the Gross Domestic Production (GDP) in nominal terms, we can observe that in 2022 the United States is still the most powerful economy with a GDP at $24.79 trillion while the GDP of China follows afterwards at $18.46 trillion which is far ahead of Japan, the third largest economy with a GDP of $5.38 trillion. Moreover, these two countries dominate the manufacturing in the world, which takes a great proportion of economic impetus due to flexible industrial policies and effective investments from governments and enterprises.

show abstract

Section: Impact On Chinese Manufacturing and Mic 2025mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Impact On Chinese Manufacturing and Mic 2025mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Impact of the Trade War on Manufacturing and Workers in China and the United States

Zhao¹

2023

HBEM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It relates to the surge in development of high technologies as such and the growing awareness of the immense social changes that this development generates. The political and geopolitical results of this process have already been reflected in a number of scientific publications (i.e., Diesen, 2021;Dupont, 2020;Hoffman, Bradshaw, & Taylor, 2021;Kennedy, 2020;Komiyama & Tsuchiya, 2021;Lewis, 2019;Ma, 2021;Oxford Analytica, 2021;Przychodniak, 2019;Rühlig, Seaman, & Voelsen, 2019;Toro Hardy, 2020;Walsh, 2003;Wong, 2021;Wright, 2020;Zhang, 2020).…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

European Union at the Dawn of Technological Cold War

Gajewski

2023

TIS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of the study was to construct a picture of the EU’s global position in a world defined by the US-Chinese technological Cold War. Morphological analysis has been used to enable a comprehensive analysis of the relationship between the technological and social domains. Structured interviews were also used to support the analytical process. The results of the exploration showed a picture of the EU’s multi-level technological weakness compared to competing powers. While the EU is not a weak entity, its future international position will depend on the creation of its own technological capabilities and on cooperation with the United States. Both lines of action are subject to multiple risks. Firstly, some aggressive technological developments (such as the plans to place microchips production in Europe) can generate more problems than diversification. Secondly, the EU must extend its work on high-tech (primarily AI) beyond the logic of market regulation and focus on their geopolitical and military dimension. It must also be ready for possible obstacles in cooperation with the United States. The alternative to this track, as the analysis shows, is the technological, and hence the political and economic peripheral status, where two technological superpowers – the United States and authoritarian China will compete. The most negative result for the EU is the status of “digital colony”. The paper aspires to be a part of the effort to fill the existing void in the scientific output of Polish social sciences, regarding exploration of the geopolitical dimension of technological progress, especially its impact on EU’s position in the new power distribution model, which will be the result of the rivalry between the US and China.

show abstract

“…Therefore, the development of IoT technology needs to be combined with China's specific national conditions and the current situation of industrial development to give priority to the development of IoT technology and provide a scientific basis for the country's macrodecision. At the same time, it is necessary to accelerate the development of the standardization of IoT technology [ 20 ] and steadily promote the promotion and application of IoT, to improve the overall level of IoT technology in China. With the rapid development of information technology, the scale of the IoT market will gradually expand, not only bringing huge economic benefits to society but also effectively safeguarding national security.…”

Section: Optimization Of Stp Innovation Management Mechanisms Driven By Advanced Evolutionary Iot Arithmeticmentioning

confidence: 99%

Optimization of STP Innovation Management Mechanisms Driven by Advanced Evolutionary IoT Arithmetic

Wang

Qing

Li³

2021

Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Since industrialization, manufacturing has been an important pillar of a country’s economic development. Under the dual pressure of the new trend of global manufacturing development and the loss of competitive advantage of manufacturing industry, it is especially important to accelerate the enhancement of national high technology innovation capacity and the optimization of high technology policy innovation management mechanism driven by advanced evolutionary Internet of Things (IoT) arithmetic. The main of this paper thus introduces the effective method of optimization of high technology policy innovation management mechanism driven by advanced evolutionary IoT arithmetic. To study the optimization of high technology policy innovation management mechanism, a conceptual analysis of currently popular information technologies, such as big data technologies, artificial intelligence technologies, and Internet of Things technologies, and an overview of the application of these technologies in microgrids are given. In the paper, all factors are studied using the STP innovation management mechanism-based approach, and finally, all factors are classified into two categories of cause and effect factors by this approach, and the importance of all factors is ranked. Secondly, a wind power prediction algorithm based on data mining technology and an improved algorithm and a PV power prediction algorithm based on a deep neural network were established with the technical support of high-tech information technology such as big data and artificial intelligence. Finally, the majorization of high technology policy innovation management mechanism driven by advanced evolutionary IoT arithmetic is proposed.

show abstract

Industrial Policy and Technology Innovation under the US Trade War against China

Cited by 21 publications

References 14 publications

The Impact of the Trade War on Manufacturing and Workers in China and the United States

The Impact of the Trade War on Manufacturing and Workers in China and the United States

European Union at the Dawn of Technological Cold War

Optimization of STP Innovation Management Mechanisms Driven by Advanced Evolutionary IoT Arithmetic

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About