2017
DOI: 10.1093/cje/bex004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Industrial policy and exchange rate scepticism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kaldor, for example, emphasized the importance of the exchange rate for manufacturing industries, which enjoy increasing returns: ‘The task of maintaining competitiveness through the choice of a favorable exchange rate is therefore of the highest importance to an industrial country from the point of view of its long‐run growth potential and not only on account of its short‐ or medium‐term effect on the level of employment’ (Kaldor, 1971: 8). For a review of earlier discussions of RER and industrial policy, see Bresser‐Pereira and Rugitsky (2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kaldor, for example, emphasized the importance of the exchange rate for manufacturing industries, which enjoy increasing returns: ‘The task of maintaining competitiveness through the choice of a favorable exchange rate is therefore of the highest importance to an industrial country from the point of view of its long‐run growth potential and not only on account of its short‐ or medium‐term effect on the level of employment’ (Kaldor, 1971: 8). For a review of earlier discussions of RER and industrial policy, see Bresser‐Pereira and Rugitsky (2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up to 1970 they viewed the shortage of foreign capitals as a major obstacle to growth. When, after the 1973 first oil shock, the major international private banks resumed finance to Latin American countries, which was unavailable since the 1929 crash and the Great Depression, developmental economists in Brazil have commemorated the "good new".27 SeeBresser-Pereira and Rugitsky (2018). In this paper there are citations of Prebisch that show clearly this skepticism.Brazilian Journal of PoliticalEconomy 39 (2), 2019 • pp.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…To address export demand as a structural constraint, Kaldor proposed to promote industrial specialisation and export expansion using IP to increase competitiveness in sectors that would lead to a rise (decline) in the economy's income elasticity of exports (imports) (Toner 1999; see also Thirlwall, 2013). A sub-set of theories in the tradition of Brazilian New Developmentalism argues that IP to build capacity in sectors with high export growth potential needs to be supported by an exchange rate regime that makes domestic firms internationally competitive for a given technology or productivity gap, i. e. by an undervalued exchange rate (Bresser-Pereira and Rugitsky, 2018;Oreiro et al, 2020;Gabriel et al, 2020).…”
Section: The Possibilities Of and Limitations To Demand-side Policy I...mentioning
confidence: 99%