Abstract:Green hydrogen production by electrolysis using renewable power allows for decoupling the time and location of hydrogen production and use. Even if pipeline transport of hydrogen is most economic for large scale, transport by trailers will be present in near and mid‐term future since the construction of a hydrogen pipeline network will take a long time. Furthermore, the volume of trailer transport will increase with increasing hydrogen demand raising the question what the best hydrogen carrier is.
Within this … Show more
“…An in-depth insight into optimal energy system layout and conditions for economic feasibility was provided by Morgenthaler et al (2020). Syngas, as an important intermediate of the chemical industry, is neither transported nor directly sold as a final product, in contrast to H 2 (Peschel, 2020). This might be the reason that only one life cycle assessment (LCA) study was found analyzing solely the production of syngas so far (Sternberg and Bardow, 2016).…”
“…An in-depth insight into optimal energy system layout and conditions for economic feasibility was provided by Morgenthaler et al (2020). Syngas, as an important intermediate of the chemical industry, is neither transported nor directly sold as a final product, in contrast to H 2 (Peschel, 2020). This might be the reason that only one life cycle assessment (LCA) study was found analyzing solely the production of syngas so far (Sternberg and Bardow, 2016).…”
“…Recently, many studies concern the comparison of the economical aspects of storing hydrogen in LOHC compared to compresses gas or liquefied H 2 [74,75]. Some recent studies [43,76] conclude that if the heat needed for dehydrogenation is sustainably managed (e.g., waste heat), dibenzyltoluene or toluene are systems of choice both in terms of efficiency and costs.…”
The term LOHC stands for Liquid Organic Hydrogen Carriers. The term has been so well accepted by the scientific community that the studies published before the existence of this name are not very visible. In this mini-review, we have tried to rehabilitate various studies that deserve to be put back in the spotlight in the present context. Studies indeed began in the early 1980s and many publications have compared the use of various organic carriers, various catalysts and reactors. Recent reviews also include the economic aspects of this concept.
“…Industrial practice specifies a deoxygenation reactor (Peschel, 2020) which catalytically combines hydrogen with oxygen to generate additional water in an exothermic reaction. In this work the inlets are fed at electrolysis temperature of 60 °C before entering the adiabatic reactor and reducing oxygen concentration to 1 ppmV, also consuming hydrogen and generating additional water vapour in line with the reaction:…”
“…Drying the hydrogen can be done in a number of ways involving condensation, temperature or pressure swing adsorption, molecular sieve adsorbents or a combination of options (Ligen et al, 2020;Peschel, 2020). Increased interest in the energy requirements of this step result from the efficiency concerns of green hydrogen production and use.…”
Electrochemical ammonia generation allows direct, low pressure synthesis of ammonia as an alternative to the established Haber-Bosch process. The increasing need to drive industry with renewable electricity central to decarbonisation and electrochemical ammonia synthesis offers a possible efficient and low emission route for this increasingly important chemical. It also provides a potential route for more distributed and small-scale ammonia synthesis with a reduced production footprint. Electrochemical ammonia synthesis is still early stage but has seen recent acceleration in fundamental understanding. In this work, two different ammonia electrolysis systems are considered. Balance of plant (BOP) requirements are presented and modelled to compare performance and determine trade-offs. The first option (water fed cell) uses direct ammonia synthesis from water and air. The second (hydrogen-fed cell), involves a two-step electrolysis approach firstly producing hydrogen followed by electrochemical ammonia generation. Results indicate that the water fed approach shows the most promise in achieving low energy demand for direct electrochemical ammonia generation. Breaking the reaction into two steps for the hydrogen fed approach introduces a source of inefficiency which is not overcome by reduced BOP energy demands, and will only be an attractive pathway for reactors which promise both high efficiency and increased ammonia formation rate compared to water fed cells. The most optimised scenario investigated here with 90% faradaic efficiency (FE) and 1.5 V cell potential (75% nitrogen utilisation) gives a power to ammonia value of 15 kWh/kg NH3 for a water fed cell. For the best hydrogen fed arrangement, the requirement is 19 kWh/kg NH3. This is achieved with 0.5 V cell potential and 75% utilisation of both hydrogen and nitrogen (90% FE). Modelling demonstrated that balance of plant requirements for electrochemical ammonia are significant. Electrochemical energy inputs dominate energy requirements at low FE, however in cases of high FE the BOP accounts for approximately 50% of the total energy demand, mostly from ammonia separation requirements. In the hydrogen fed cell arrangement, it was also demonstrated that recycle of unconverted hydrogen is essential for efficient operation, even in the case where this increases BOP energy inputs.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.