2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2017.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Industrial maintenance decision-making: A systematic literature review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
68
0
5

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 155 publications
0
68
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…This research shall be based on a Systematic Literature Review, or SLR. Thus, the sections and the review methodology shall be designed according to the SLR method, as highlighted in [66][67][68][69][70]. In conducting this research, requirements such as thoroughness and depth were deemed as important to this research.…”
Section: Review Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This research shall be based on a Systematic Literature Review, or SLR. Thus, the sections and the review methodology shall be designed according to the SLR method, as highlighted in [66][67][68][69][70]. In conducting this research, requirements such as thoroughness and depth were deemed as important to this research.…”
Section: Review Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SLR has been proposed as a detailed type of research which takes into consideration the broad foundation [16], as well as being transparent, explanatory, heuristic [67], context-sensitive, and able to achieve evidence-informed reviews and decisions [66]. Thus, the need for an SLR in the review of data-driven circular approaches in manufacturing for digital technologies is predicated on the view that SLR can help this research identify research trends, future work in the area, and the tools used in solving the problems being addressed [68]. Figure 2 on the next page describes the systematic literature review phases.…”
Section: Review Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In manufacturing, industrial production managers are responsible for continuously detecting and responding to problems in operational control, while also improving production by deciding how equipment, personnel, and planning are combined (Lim, 2014;Ruschel et al, 2017;Sánchez-Márquez et al, 2018) -increasing efficiency is a constant process of finding inefficiencies demanding intelligent action. Operational control in manufacturing offers several paradigmatic cases from equipment, personnel, and planning; typically, system components interact in non-obvious ways and frequently, only a subset of the whole system can be optimized (Pawlak, 2016;Lawrence, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors propose a replacement policy to maximize reliability in a mission-based system. On the basis of the same concepts,Poór et al (2014) 186 consider the key role of machine and plant maintenance in terms of facility management (FM) for manufacturing companies.As affirmed by ViswanathDhanisetty et al (2018), the existing literature shows a wide variety of examples making use of MCDM methods as supporting tools to manage maintenance decision making processes Ruschel et al (2017). lead a systematic review focused on the vast amount of decision-making models adopted in the literature and aimed at enhancing the following areas: maintenance management, maintenance planning, maintenance policy selection, maintenance efficiency analysis, equipment lifecycle management, process monitoring analysis, machine health prognosis, reliability analysis, system and component degradation, maintenance outsourcing, joint optimization, multi-level system integration, multi-state system optimization, risk and consequence analysis, maintenance cost estimation, and inspection and maintenance intervals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%