2014
DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2014.904505
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Industrial Dynamics and Clusters: A Survey

Abstract: We review the literature on clusters and their effects on entry, exit and growth of firms as well on the evolutionary dynamics underlying the process of cluster formation. Our extensive review shows that there is strong evidence that clusters promote entry, but little evidence that clusters enhance firm growth and firm survival. The emergence of clusters is best understood as an evolutionary process of capability transmission between parent firms and their spinoffs, rather than as an outcome of localisation ec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
104
0
7

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 156 publications
6
104
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Firms may be co-located but not be in contact with each other and thus fail to exchange knowledge and experience -network contacts do not emerge as a matter of course (Dolfsma et al 2009). This may explain why a recent review of the effect of regional clustering of firms does not seem to promote firm growth (Frenken et al 2014). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Firms may be co-located but not be in contact with each other and thus fail to exchange knowledge and experience -network contacts do not emerge as a matter of course (Dolfsma et al 2009). This may explain why a recent review of the effect of regional clustering of firms does not seem to promote firm growth (Frenken et al 2014). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differentiation by these related firms may allow a firm to obtain the offering that best fits with its own strategic choice. Firms located in a cluster may benefit from knowledge spill-overs and thus be more innovative (Frenken et al 2014;Van der Panne 2004;Arkhan 2009). …”
Section: Classic Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This breaks down the usual diversity conceptualization in two distinctive elements that have marked different outcomes. Regional specialization and clustering remain traditionally hypothesized to be attached to productivity growth (Kemeny and Storper 2014;Frenken et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, if firms collaborate but are not located in proximity, they may at some point move closer together. FRENKEN et al (2015) provide a valuable review of research on the relationship between industrial clusters and the entry, growth and exit of firms. They suggest that firms in the same industry can lose knowledge and talent to rivals if they are located in proximity, whereas firms in related industries are more likely to benefit from co-location and less likely to suffer.…”
Section: Introduction To the 50th Volumementioning
confidence: 99%