2019
DOI: 10.2138/rmg.2019.85.16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Industrial Deployment of Reactive Transport Simulation: An Application to Uranium In situ Recovery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During this process, the fluid continuously circulates between the injection and pumping wells in a loop both underground and at the surface. U is extracted from the pumped fluid, whose pH is monitored and readjusted before reinjection in order to maintain its ability to dissolve U in the rock (see Lagneau et al, 2019 for further details). A summarised description of the ISR test is available in Cardon et al (2016) andde Boissezon et al (2017).…”
Section: Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…During this process, the fluid continuously circulates between the injection and pumping wells in a loop both underground and at the surface. U is extracted from the pumped fluid, whose pH is monitored and readjusted before reinjection in order to maintain its ability to dissolve U in the rock (see Lagneau et al, 2019 for further details). A summarised description of the ISR test is available in Cardon et al (2016) andde Boissezon et al (2017).…”
Section: Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The absolute difference of activity between the F and L samples could be explained by a variation of the initial U content on both samples, affecting hotspots and diffuse area activities similarly. Ra (de Boissezon et al, 2017;Lagneau et al, 2019). It appears that Fe-Ti minerals constitute an efficient trap for the "undetectable" U daughters.…”
Section: Implication For the Mobility Of 238 U Daughters Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Such variations could be explained by the activity of sulphate reducing bacteria (SRB) known to favour the reduction of sulphate concurrently to the oxidation of organic carbon (higher values observed in the mineralized and reduced parts of the aquifer, up to 3.67 mg/L for MOZO_0007) into carbonate and sulphide according to the overall simplified reaction, where redox conditions are here controlled by the solubility of ferric hydroxide (Fe(OH) 3 (s)) and pyrite (FeS 2 (s)), respectively, upstream and downstream the roll-front. 4 and, on the other hand, the affinity of cations towards clay minerals through sorption processes [27][28][29]. Concentrations of major anions (Cl, SO 4 ) are therefore also varying in the same way with respect to the electrical balance.…”
Section: Water Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%